green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Adrian F. Searcy
(2×)
See United States v. Lenfesty, 923 F.2d 1293, 1300 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 968 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Adrian F. Searcy
(2×)
See United States v. Lenfesty, 923 F.2d 1293, 1300 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 968 , 111 S.Ct. 1602 , 113 L.Ed.2d 665 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas J. McCarthy
See United States v. Lenfesty, 923 F.2d 1293, 1296 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 968 , 111 S.Ct. 1602 , 113 L.Ed.2d 665 (1991) (agent’s testimony concerning details of a drug ring learned through statements of a nontestifying coconspirator was *1573 not hearsay under Rule 801(d)(2)(E) because statements were made by a cocon-spirator, during and in furtherance of the conspiracy).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1996
See United States v. Lenfesty, 923 F.2d 1293, 1296 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 968 , 111 S.Ct. 1602 , 113 L.Ed.2d 665 (1991) (agent's testimony concerning details of a drug ring learned through statements of a nontestifying coconspirator was not hearsay under Rule 801(d)(2)(E) because statements were made by a coconspirator, during and in furtherance of the conspiracy).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Julio Ortiz
See United States v. Williams, 919 F.2d 1451, 1458 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 968 , 111 S.Ct. 1604 , 113 L.Ed.2d 667 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Derrick A. Anderson
See United States v. Lenfesty, 923 F.2d 1293, 1299 (8th Cir.) ("Because the net sentencing range under the Guidelines in effect when [the defendant] sold crank [methamphetamine] was less than the net sentencing range of the Guidelines in effect at sentencing, the District Court properly began its calculations with the former, less harsh, range."), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 968 , 111 S.Ct. 1602 , 113 L.Ed.2d 665 (1991); cf. United States v. Fones, 51 F.3d 663, 669 (7th Cir.1995) (noting that district court applied earlier version of guidelines because the overall offense level calculations under t…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gonzalez Vazquez
It is a corollary of this principle that, as we recently stated in a case comparable to this one, “the fact that a defendant misapprehends the likely guideline sentencing range does not constitute a fair and just reason for withdrawing a guilty plea.” De Alba Pagan, 33 F.3d at 127 ; accord United States v. Williams, 919 F.2d 1451, 1456-57 (10th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 499 U.S. 968 , 111 S.Ct. 1604 , 113 L.Ed.2d 667 (1991); United States v. Garcia, 909 F.2d 1346, 1348 (9th Cir.1990); United States v. Bradley, 905 F.2d 359, 360 (11th Cir.1990); United States v. Stephens, 906 F.2d 251, 253 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Allen McKinney
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Provost, 921 F.2d 163, 164 (8th Cir.1990) (per curiam), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 968 , 111 S.Ct. 1603 , 113 L.Ed.2d 666 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Allen McKinney
See, e.g., United States v. Provost, 921 F.2d 163, 164 (8th Cir. 1990) (per curiam), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 968 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marcus Lacey
See also United States v. Lenfesty, 923 F.2d 1293 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 968 (1991) (rejecting defendant's request to receive the benefit of a favorable change in a later version of the Guidelines while continuing to benefit from more lenient provisions in an earlier version of the Guidelines). 6 Because defendant does not appeal the district court's use of the 1989 Guidelines, we conclude that defendant's request that the 1989 Guidelines be utilized for determining his sentence amounted to a forfeiture of his right to be sentenced under the 1993 Guidelines that contain the languag…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mark William Paul Staufer
(2×)
See also, United States v. Lenfesty, 923 F.2d 1293, 1300 (8th Cir.) (indicating that it is possible that when “outrageous official conduct overcomes the will of an individual predisposed only to dealing in small quantities” a sentence reduction may be appropriate), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 968 , 111 S.Ct. 1602 , 113 L.Ed.2d 665 (1991); United States v. Connell, 960 F.2d 191, 196 (1st Cir.1992) (leaving open the possibility that sentencing entrapment may be an appropriate basis for reducing a sentence).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca8 1994
This circuit has recognized that "there could be situations in which the government engages in continuing undercover or sting transactions for the sole purpose of ratcheting up a sentence under the guidelines." United States v. Shephard, 4 F.3d 647, 649 (8th Cir.1993); see also United States v. Calva, 979 F.2d 119, 122-23 (8th Cir.1992), and United States v. Lenfesty, 923 F.2d 1293, 1300 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 968 , 111 S.Ct. 1602 , 113 L.Ed.2d 665 (1991). 30 Mr. Friends testified with respect to this issue at the sentencing hearing, but the trial court found that, in this case…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Magee
This circuit has recognized that “there could be situations in which the government engages in continuing undercover or sting transactions for the sole purpose of ratcheting up a sentence under the guidelines.” United States v. Shephard, 4 F.3d 647, 649 (8th Cir.1993); see also United States v. Calva, 979 F.2d 119, 122-23 (8th Cir.1992), and United States v. Lenfesty, 923 F.2d 1293, 1300 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 968 , 111 S.Ct. 1602 , 113 L.Ed.2d 665 (1991).
Cueto
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-7301.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 15, 1991.
499 U.S. 968
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.