green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Siegal
But see In re Billman, 915 F.2d 916, 921 (4th Cir.1990) (substitute assets can be preserved by restraint upon showing that assets forfeitable under § 1963(a) are unavailable), cer t. denied sub nom McKinney v. United States, 500 U.S. 952 , 111 S.Ct. 2258 , 114 L.Ed.2d 711 (1991).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Gigante
See United States v. Field, 62 F.3d 246 (8th Cir.1995); United States v. Ripinsky, 20 F.3d 359 (9th Cir.1994); In re Martin, 1 F.3d 1351 (3d Cir.1993); United States v. Floyd, 992 F.2d 498 (5th Cir.1993) (en banc); but see In re Billman, 915 F.2d 916 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 952 , 111 S.Ct. 2258 , 114 L.Ed.2d 711 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
PEOPLE OF CAL. EX REL. ERVIN v. District Director
See Church of Scientology of California v. United States, 920 F.2d 1481, 1484-1485 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 952 , 111 S.Ct. 2258 , 114 L.Ed.2d 711 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Riley
See In re Billman, 915 F.2d 916 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 952 , 111 S.Ct. 2258 , 114 L.Ed.2d 711 (1991) 5 See 15 U.S.C. § 1012 (b).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ferrell T. Riley
See In re Billman, 915 F.2d 916 (4th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 952 , 111 S.Ct. 2258 , 114 L.Ed.2d 711 (1991). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Swank Corp.
The United States argues that the date of acquisition of Swank’s properties is immaterial, as the whole purpose of the statutory provision providing for substitution of assets is to enable the government to satisfy an order of forfeiture out of property which is not otherwise subject to forfeiture. 21 U.S.C. § 853 (p); see In re Billman, 915 F.2d 916, 921 (4th Cir.1990) (“the purpose of § 1963(d)(1)(A) is to preserve pending trial the availability for forfeiture of property that can be forfeited after trial”), 1 cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2258 , 114 L.Ed.2d 711 (1991). 21 U.…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Watson v. Chessman
See also Church of Scientology of California v. U.S., 920 F.2d 1481, 1485 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 952 , 111 S.Ct. 2258 , 114 L.Ed.2d 711 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barrett v. Harwood
Marano, *747 1993 WL 17434 at *3; see also Church of Scientology of California v. United States, 920 F.2d 1481, 1488 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 952 , 111 S.Ct. 2258 , 114 L.Ed.2d 711 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Juri Ripinsky, (Two Cases)
Compare In re Assets of Martin, 1 F.3d 1351 (3d Cir.1993) (substitute assets are not subject to pretrial restraint under 18 U.S.C. § 1963 ) and United States v. Floyd, 992 F.2d 498 (5th Cir.1993) (substitute assets are not subject to pretrial restraint under 21 U.S.C. § 853 ) with In re Billman, 915 F.2d 916 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 952 , 111 S.Ct. 2258 , 114 L.Ed.2d 711 (1991) (substitute assets are subject to pretrial restraint under 18 U.S.C. § 1963 ) and United States v. Regan, 858 F.2d 115 (2d Cir.1988) (suggesting similar result under 18 U.S.C. § 1963 and holding that a…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Beard
See, e.g., Stahn v. Haeckel, 920 F.2d 555 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2258 , 114 L.Ed.2d 711 (1991) (holding that bankruptcy court has discretionary power, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 105 (a), to order preconfirmation plan payments in a Chapter 12 proceeding).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gordon R. STAHN
v.
Ray HAECKEL
v.
Ray HAECKEL
No. 90-1549.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 3, 1991.
Cited by 34 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Denied.