green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
“a detailed eye-witness report of a crime is self-corroborating; it supplies its own indicia of reliability.”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Samir Akrawi
a detailed eye-witness report of a crime is self-corroborating; it supplies its own indicia of reliability.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cooper
See United States v. Elliott, 893 F.2d 220, 223 (9th Cir.1990), amended on other grounds, 904 F.2d 25 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 268 , 112 L.Ed.2d 224 (1990) (informant’s willingness to be named is indicia of reliability and veracity.) Though she did not give her statement under oath or before a magistrate, the law does not require as much.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Russell
See United States v. Russell, 905 F.2d 1450 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 498 U.S. 904 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lee Andrew Edwards
See United States v. Baker, 905 F.2d 1100, 1103 (1990) (citing Jeffers v. United States, 432 U.S. 137 , 97 S.Ct. 2207 , 53 L.Ed.2d 168 (1977)), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 270 , 112 L.Ed.2d 226 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
ca10 1994
See United States v. Russell, 905 F.2d 1450 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 904 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arminta Mohundro Russell
See U.S. v. Russell, 905 F.2d 1450 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 904 (1990). 4 On November 21, 1991, the petitioner filed a habeas corpus action in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, alleging that (1) her sentence was based on erroneous information in the presentence report; (2) the district court's upward departure from the Sentencing Guidelines was improper; (3) the district court's imposition of consecutive sentences was improper; and (4) she was denied effective assistance of counsel.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arminta Mohundro Russell
See United States v. Russell, 905 F.2d 1450 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 904 (1990). 2 The petitioner subsequently filed this habeas action in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, asserting the following grounds for relief: 1) her sentence was based on erroneous information in the presentence report, 2) the district court's upward departure from the guidelines was improper, 3) the district court's imposition of consecutive sentences was improper, and 4) she was denied effective assistance of counsel.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas William Litchfield
See 18 U.S.C. § 3584 (b).” United States v. Russell, 905 F.2d 1450, 1457 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 267 , 112 L.Ed.2d 224 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Francisco Vasquez-Torrez v. Donald A. Dorsey, Warden, Southern New Mexico Correctional Facility New Mexico Attorney General
Under the circumstances presented, we cannot say that the admission of Marchand's testimony, which involved a judgment properly committed to the sound discretion of the state trial court, see Tome Land & Improvement Co. v. Silva, 494 P.2d 962, 966 (N.M.1972); see also Beachum v. Tansy, 903 F.2d 1321, 1331 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 904 (1990), was improper under state evidentiary law, much less fundamentally unfair in a federal constitutional sense. 6 The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico is AFFIRMED. 1 This order and judgment is not binding p…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca3 1995
United States v. Jones, 801 F.2d 304, 307 (8th Cir.1986) (noting that three separate, unrelated, drug sales would not establish a continuing series); see also United States v. Baker, 905 F.2d 1100, 1104 (7th Cir.) (stating that "an unrelated conspiracy does not count [for CCE purposes] because it cannot be part of the 'continuing' series"), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 876 , 111 S.Ct. 206 , 112 L.Ed.2d 167 , and cert. denied, 498 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 270 , 112 L.Ed.2d 226 (1990), and cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1030 , 111 S.Ct. 686 , 112 L.Ed.2d 677 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edmonds
(2×)
United States v. Jones, 801 F.2d 304, 307 (8th Cir.1986) (noting that three separate, unrelated, drug sales would not establish a continuing series); see also United States v. Baker, 905 F.2d 1100, 1104 (7th Cir.) (stating that “an unrelated conspiracy does not count [for CCE purposes] because it cannot be part of the ‘continuing’ series”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 876 , 111 S.Ct. 206 , 112 L.Ed.2d 167 , and cert. denied, 498 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 270 , 112 L.Ed.2d 226 (1990), and cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1030 , 111 S.Ct. 686 , 112 L.Ed.2d 677 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vaughan
See, e.g., United States v. Elliott, 893 F.2d 220, 225 (9th Cir.), opinion amended and rehearing denied, 904 F.2d 25 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 268 , 112 L.Ed.2d 224 (1990) (warrant for apartment included adjacent storeroom); Commonwealth v. Scala, 380 Mass. 500 , 404 N.E.2d 83, 89 (1980) (designation of second floor apartment encompassed search of attic inasmuch as entrance to attic was from second floor apartment and no other apartments shared the attic); United States v. Heldt, 668 F.2d at 1265-1266 (warrant for suite of offices of individual authorized search of adj…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lisa Rosemary Thornton, Also Known as Lisa Rosemary Austin, Also Known as Lisa Rosemary Sparger, Also Known as Lisa Rosemary Walker
United States v. Fortenbury, 917 F.2d 477, 479 (10th Cir.1990); see also United States v. Russell, 905 F.2d 1450, 1456 (10th Cir.) (quoting United States v. Roberson, 872 F.2d 597, 607-08 (5th Cir.1989)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 267 , 112 L.Ed.2d 224 (1990); United States v. Bernhardt, 905 F.2d 343, 345-46 (10th Cir.1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jackson
See, e.g., United States v. Russell, 905 F.2d 1450, 1456 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 267 , 112 L.Ed.2d 224 (1990).
Russell
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-5496.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1990.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.