green
Positive treatment
9.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Rhoades v. Jeffreys
See Martin v. Davies, 917 F.2d 336, 340 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1208 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re LTR
See State v. Phillips, 328 N.C. 1 , 399 S.E.2d 293 , cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1208 , 111 S.Ct. 2804 , 115 L.Ed.2d 977 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
In re L.T.R.
See State v. Phillips, 328 N.C. 1 , 399 S.E.2d 293 , cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1208 , 111 S.Ct. 2804 , 115 L.Ed.2d 977 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Kids Creek Partners, L.P.
(2×)
See Martin v. Davies, 917 F.2d 336, 339 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1208 , 111 S.Ct. 2805 , 115 L.Ed.2d 978 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
David Thrasher v. State of Missouri
See McKinnon v. Lockhart, 921 F.2d 830, 832 (8th Cir.1990) (per curiam) (claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel may be used to establish cause for procedural default only if first presented to state courts as independent Sixth Amendment claim), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1208 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
David Thrasher v. State of Missouri
See McKinnon v. Lockhart, 921 F.2d 830, 832 (8th Cir. 1990) (per curiam) (claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel may be used to establish cause for procedural default only if first presented to state courts as independent Sixth Amendment claim), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1208 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Edward Lee Clemmons v. Steven J. Davies, Brent L. Duncan
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See id.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1995
(2×)
See Smith v. Murray, 477 U.S. 527, 536 , 106 S.Ct. 2661, 2667 , 91 L.Ed.2d 434 (1986) (the "process of 'winnowing out weaker arguments on appeal and focusing on' those more likely to prevail ... is the hallmark of effective appellate advocacy") (quoting Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 751-52 , 103 S.Ct. 3308, 3313 , 77 L.Ed.2d 987 (1983)). 18 Moreover, even assuming that Charron's appellate counsel was ineffective, "cause" has still not been established because the "ineffectiveness of appellate counsel may not be asserted as cause to excuse procedural default unless the petitioner has first pre…
examined
Cited "see"
Kenneth E. Gentry v. Jack R. Duckworth, Superintendent, Indiana State Reformatory
(4×)
See Martin v. Davies, 917 F.2d 336, 340 (7th Cir.1990) (giving as examples of prejudice "court dates missed" and "inability to make timely filings"), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1208 , 111 S.Ct. 2805 , 115 L.Ed.2d 978 (1991); DeMallory v. Cullen, 855 F.2d 442, 449 (7th Cir.1988) ("Where limitations on library use prevent filing of briefs in time for the court's consideration, those limitations are sufficiently prejudicial to sustain an access-to-courts claim."); see also Strickler v. Waters, 989 F.2d 1375, 1383-85 (4th Cir.) (discussing detriment requirement), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Stradford
(2×)
See State v. Phillips, 328 N.C. 1 , 399 S.E.2d 293 , cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1208 , 111 S.Ct. 2804 , 115 L.Ed.2d 977 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony Whitmill v. Bill Armontrout
(2×)
See Smith v. Murray, 477 U.S. 527, 536, 106 S.Ct. 2661, 2667 , 91 L.Ed.2d 434 (1986). *1157 Assuming for the sake of argument that appellate counsel was ineffective, Whit-mill’s claim remains barred nonetheless because ineffectiveness of appellate counsel may not be asserted as cause to excuse pro-eedural default unless the petitioner has first presented this argument “as an independent Sixth Amendment claim to the state courts, if a forum existed to make the argument.” McKinnon v. Lockhart, 921 F.2d 830, 832 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1208 , 111 S.Ct. 2805 , 115 L.Ed.2d 978 …
discussed
Cited "see"
William A. Chavis v. J.W. Fairman, Warden/director, O. Sheahan, Cook County Sheriff and Superintendent Russell, of Division 5
See Martin v. Davies, 917 F.2d 336, 339 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 2805 , 115 L.Ed.2d 978 (1991). 28 Equitable claims arising out of violations of a contempt decree must be addressed through contempt proceedings before the supervising court.
discussed
Cited "see"
Partee v. Cook County Sheriff's Office
(2×)
See Martin v. Davies, 917 F.2d 336, 340 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1208 , 111 S.Ct. 2805 , 115 L.Ed.2d 978 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Gray v. Faulkner
See Martin v. Davies, 917 F.2d 336, 339 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2805 , 115 L.Ed.2d 978 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Robinson
State v. Franklin, 248 N.C. 695 , 104 S.E.2d 837 (1958); See also State v. Phillips, 328 N.C. 1 , 399 S.E.2d 293 , cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1208 , 115 L.Ed.2d 977 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Burr
(2×)
See State v. Carter, 338 N.C. 569, 587-88 , 451 S.E.2d 157, 167 (1994) (evidence that defendant assaulted an elderly man above his right eye with a piece of cinder block was admissible to show identity in the first-degree murder of a woman occurring eight years later where one cause of the victim's death was blunt trauma to the head caused by a brick and the primary wound was above the right eye), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 2256 , 132 L.Ed.2d 263 (1995); see also State v. Phillips, 328 N.C. 1, 14 , 399 S.E.2d 293, 299 (evidence defendants had previously chained the victim to a pole …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Barksdale v. Michael P. Lane
See also McKinnon v. Lockhart, 921 F.2d 830 , 832-33 n. 5 (8th Cir.1990) ("pro se status and lack of familiarity with the intricacies of the law cannot alone constitute cause"), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2805 , 115 L.Ed.2d 978 (1991); Hughes v. Idaho State Bd. of Corrections, 800 F.2d 905, 909 (9th Cir.1986) ("When a pro se petitioner is able to apply for post-conviction relief to a state court, the petitioner must be held accountable for failure to timely pursue his remedy to the state supreme court."). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Craig Chapman and Jack E. Wright
See also Martin v. Davies, 917 F.2d 336, 340 (7th Cir.1990) ("Simply because a defendant has refused counsel does not entitle him to limitless access to law libraries.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2805 , 115 L.Ed.2d 978 (1991).
Cody
v.
Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services
v.
Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services
No. 90-7739.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 10, 1991.
Cited by 30 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.