green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.1 score
“a decision by this court, not overruled by the united states supreme court, is . . . binding on all inferior courts and litigants in the , and also on administrative agencies.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mendez v. Gearan
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
has been construed to provide a private right of action under section 504.
cited
Cited "see"
Robinson v. Alter Barge Line, Inc.
See Meaige v. Hartley Marine Corp., 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2826 , 115 L.Ed.2d 996 (1991); Appellate Petition found at 1991 WL 11176634 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Guy Zappulla v. People of the State of New York
See People v. Zappulla, 282 A.D.2d at 697-98 , 724 N.Y.S.2d at 435-36 . 19 Federal courts considering petitions for writs of habeas corpus are not "bound by a state appellate court's ruling in petitioner's favor on a matter of constitutional law." Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1093 (2d Cir.1990) (affirming district court denial of habeas on the basis of evidence ordered suppressed by the state appellate court), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert S. v. Stetson School
(2×)
See id. at 307B-308B (explaining that, prior to entering Stetson, Robert had a "brittle personality due to numerous problems in his early development" and that the conduct at Stetson "caused him a great deal of stress and problems"); Appendix at 744B ("Child abuse, virtually by definition, involves some violation of boundaries. . . .
discussed
Cited "see"
Alberti v. City & County of San Francisco Sheriff's Department
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1338 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1990) (holding a plaintiff need not exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit under § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act).
cited
Cited "see"
Flores v. Demskie
See Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1094 (2d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Madden-Tyler v. Maricopa County
(2×)
Accord Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1338 (9th Cir.1990), cert, denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony S. Peeples
See United States v. Vasquez, 909 F.2d 235, 239 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Velez v. People of the State of New York
It is predicated on principles of judicial comity, and is “designed to protect the state courts’ role in the enforcement of federal law and prevent disruption of state judicial proceedings.” Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 518 , 102 S.Ct. 1198, 1203 , 71 L.Ed.2d 379 (1982); see Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1094 (2d Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Remington Rand Corp. v. Amsterdam-Rotterdam Bank, N.V.
Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322, 330 , 99 S.Ct. 645, 651 , 58 L.Ed.2d 552 (1979); accord Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1096 (2d Cir.1990) (“lack of incentive to litigate vigorously may render the collateral estoppel doctrine inoperative”), cer t. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991); United States v. Berman, 884 F.2d 916, 924 (6th Cir.1989) (“Unfairness can result when the party to be bound lacked an incentive to litigate in the first trial.”) (internal quotation marks omitted); Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 28 (1982) (issue preclusion m…
discussed
Cited "see"
Remington Rand Corporation v. Amsterdam-Rotterdam Bank, N.V.
Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322, 330 , 99 S.Ct. 645, 651 , 58 L.Ed.2d 552 (1979); accord Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1096 (2d Cir.1990) ("lack of incentive to litigate vigorously may render the collateral estoppel doctrine inoperative"), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991); United States v. Berman, 884 F.2d 916, 924 (6th Cir.1989) ("Unfairness can result when the party to be bound lacked an incentive to litigate in the first trial.") (internal quotation marks omitted); Restatement (Second) of Judgments Sec. 28 (1982) (issue preclusion may not …
discussed
Cited "see"
Bingham v. Zolt
See United States v. Coiro, 922 F.2d 1008, 1017 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2826 , 115 L.Ed.2d 996 (1991); United States v. Coonan, 938 F.2d 1553, 1561-62 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 941 , 112 S.Ct. 1486 , 117 L.Ed.2d 628 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bingham v. Zolt
See United States v. Coiro, 922 F.2d 1008, 1017 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2826 , 115 L.Ed.2d 996 (1991); United States v. Coonan, 938 F.2d 1553, 1561-62 (2d Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 941 , 112 S.Ct. 1486 , 117 L.Ed.2d 628 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roger D. Maples
(2×)
See United States v. Wolak, 923 F.2d 1193, 1196-97 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 ; United States v. Glover, 846 F.2d 339, 342 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 , 109 S.Ct. 533 , 102 L.Ed.2d 565 ; United States v. Mavrokordatos, 933 F.2d 843, 847-48 (10th Cir.1991); United States v. Euceda-Hernandez, 768 F.2d 1307, 1312 (11th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1995
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1340 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991) (once employer offers legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for discharge, burden shifts to employees to demonstrate that articulated reason is pretext for handicap discrimination); Steckl v. Motorola, Inc., 703 F.2d 392, 393 (9th Cir.1983). 26 In Steckl, the court held that summary judgment for an employer was appropriate on an employee's claim that he was not promoted because of his age.
discussed
Cited "see"
Collings v. Longview Fibre Co.
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1340 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991) (once employer offers legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for discharge, burden shifts to employees to demonstrate that articulated reason is pretext for handicap discrimination); Steckl v. Motorola, Inc., 703 F.2d 392, 393 (9th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Bates v. United States
See Wilson v. United States, 917 F.2d 529, 532 (Fed.Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991) (citing 10 U.S.C. §§ 1331 , 1333, 1401 (1988)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Veal v. Memorial Hospital of Washington County
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1335 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991) (“there is no indication that Congress intended to foreclose section 1983 claims that are unrelated to handicap discrimination’’); see also Alexander, 773 F.2d at 855-56 (Title VI only precludes actions under § 1983 that are “based on” those titles; “only if the right asserted was created by Title VII must it be vindicated through the procedural system set up in that Act”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tyler v. City of Manhattan
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1336 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991); Doe v. Region 13 Mental Health-Mental Retardation Comm., 704 F.2d 1402 , 1407 n. 3 (5th Cir.), reh’g en banc denied, 709 F.2d 712 (5th Cir.1983); Rivera Flores v. Puerto Rico Telephone Co., 776 F.Supp. 61, 71 (D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ethridge v. State of Ala.
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991); Pushkin v. Regents of the University of Colorado, 658 F.2d 1372 (10th Cir.1981); Ali v. City of Clearwater, 807 F.Supp. 701 (M.D.Fla.1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Guardino
Inc. v Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., 492 US 229, 243 [1989]; see also United States v Coiro, 922 F2d 1008 [2d Cir 1991], cert denied 501 US 1217 [1991]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Township of Dover v. Scuorzo
See also Wilson v. United States, 917 F. 2d 529 (Fed.Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed. 2d 995 (1991) (holding that the phrase "on active duty" in 10 U.S.C.A. § 1163 (d), which protects certain members of the Reserves from involuntary release prior to qualifying for retirement, does not include "active duty for training").
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Saunders
See also In re Ivy, 1988 WL 409629 (D.Or.1988), aff'd 920 F.2d 936 (9th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied 501 U.S. 1217, 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richter v. Revco D.S., Inc.
See also Heerdink v. Amoco Oil Co., 919 F.2d 1256, 1261 (7th Cir., 1990) (“It is not appropriate for the courts to fetter management’s discretion by substituting their own judgment as to proper hiring practices.”), reh’g denied (1991), cert denied 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2826 , 115 L.Ed.2d 996 (1991); Weihaupt v. American Medical Ass’n, 874 F.2d 419, 429 (7th Cir.1989) (“the mere fact that their beliefs were based on subjective factors fails to establish that their assessment of Weihaupt’s skills were [sic] made in bad faith.”); Dorsch v. L.B.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Crespo v. New York City Police Commissioner
Under New York law, “a party has not had a full and fair opportunity to litigate an issue if it has had no opportunity to appeal the adverse finding.” Fletcher, 68 F.3d at 1458 (citing People v. Medina, 208 A.D.2d 771, 772 , 617 N.Y.S.2d 491, 493 (2d Dep’t 1994), appeal denied, 84 N.Y.2d 1035 , 623 N.Y.S.2d 191 , 647 N.E.2d 463 (1995)); see also Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1096 (2d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991) (collateral es-toppel does not apply when appellate review is unobtainable as a matter of law).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Daryl H. Bunkley v. Larry R. Meachum, Commissioner of Correction, State of Connecticut
See also Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1095 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fletcher v. Atex, Inc.
People v. Medina, 208 A.D.2d 771 , 617 N.Y.S.2d 491, 493 (2d Dep’t 1994); see also Pinkney v. Keane, 737 F.Supp. 187, 195 (E.D.N.Y.) (“Under New York law, a party who has obtained a final judgment in its favor is not normally precluded from relitigating a subsidiary issue that was decided against it.”), aff'd, 920 F.2d 1090 (2d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca2 1995
People v. Medina, 208 A.D.2d 771 , 617 N.Y.S.2d 491, 493 (2d Dep't 1994); see also Pinkney v. Keane, 737 F.Supp. 187, 195 (E.D.N.Y.) ("Under New York law, a party who has obtained a final judgment in its favor is not normally precluded from relitigating a subsidiary issue that was decided against it."), aff'd, 920 F.2d 1090 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael J. Taylor v. Ralph E. Henson
App.3d 1080, 1087 , 471 N.E.2d 968, 974 (App. Div. 1984) ("[W]hen probable cause for a warrantless arrest exists, it follows that an arrest is not invalidated because it was made pursuant to an invalid warrant."); see also Smith v. City of Chicago, 913 F.2d 469, 473 (7th Cir. 1990) (the existence of probable cause bars section 1983 claim), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 (1991). 19 Probable cause for a warrantless search exists if, at the moment the arrest was made, the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge and of which they had reasonably trustworthy information were sufficient t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. County of Milwaukee
Thus, the courts that have ruled on the issue have found that because Title II takes its procedures from the Rehabilitation Act, it does not contain an exhaustion requirement, and Title II eases can be filed without having filed with a federal agency first. 10 Petersen v. University of Wis. Bd. of Regents, 818 F.Supp. 1276 (W.D.Wis.1993); Noland v. Wheatley, 835 F.Supp. 476, 483 (N.D.Ind. 1993); Finley v. Giacobbe, 827 F.Supp. 215 , 219 n. 3 (S.D.N.Y.1993); see also Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1338 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991); 42 U.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Terri L. NICHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony M. FRANK, Postmaster General; U.S. Postal Service, Defendants-Appellants
(2×)
See, e.g., Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1337 (9th Cir.1990) (holding that compensatory money damages are generally "distinct" from equitable forms of relief, such as injunctions or back pay), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991). 78 In sum, Nichols may recover payments for discriminatory harm to the full extent allowed by Title VII.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Douglas Carter v. William T. Burch Vernon Beamer, and John R. Isom Jeffrey Brown
See also Smith v. City of Chicago, 913 F.2d 469, 473 (7th Cir.1990) (to recover more than nominal damages for a § 1983 action based on a false arrest, the plaintiff must show that although the defendants fabricated evidence, plaintiff would not have been arrested in the absence of the fabricated evidence), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kennedy v. Guilford Technical Community College
Mich. 1984) (construing Michigan’s “Whistleblowers’ Protection Act”); see also Heerdink v. Amoco Oil Co., 919 F.2d 1256, 1260 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 115 L.Ed.2d 996 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kenneth Duane Lennox
Additionally, we "may reverse a judgment only if the instructions, viewed as a whole, were confusing, misleading and prejudicial." Id.; see also United States v. Wolak, 923 F.2d 1193, 1198 (6th Cir.) (where the evidence against a defendant is substantial, district court's failure to give instruction may constitute harmless error), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 (1991). 22 Relying exclusively on United States v. Alston, 551 F.2d 315 (D.C.Cir.1976), Lennox argues that the district court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that there is no negative implication to the word "alibi," and that an ali…
Vasquez
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-1509.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1991.
Published
Citer courts: Board of Immigration Appeals (1) · N.D. California (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.