green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
6.4 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[T]he fact that a motion for remand [is] pending does not excuse failing to pursue discovery diligently.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "but see"
Reich v. Davidson Lumber Sales Emp. Ret. Plan
But see Herberger v. Shanbaum, 897 F.2d 801, 804 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 60 , 112 L.Ed.2d 35 (1990).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wells' Dairy, Inc. v. American Industrial Refrigeration, Inc.
when determining fraudulent joinder, the district court may look to the facts as established by summary judgment evidence as well as the controlling state law
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Glover by and Through Glover v. Donnell
while we have frequently cautioned the district courts against pretrying a case to determine removal jurisdiction, we have also endorsed a summary judgment-like procedure for disposing of fraudulent joinder claims.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wind v. Eli Lilly & Co.
he fact that a motion for remand pending does not excuse failing to pursue discovery diligently.
cited
Cited "see"
Hardy v. Ducote
See Carriere v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 893 F.2d 98, 100 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 60 , 112 L.Ed.2d 35 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Musacchia v. Sanderson Farms Inc
See Carriere v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 893 F.2d 98, 100 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chamberlain v. American Tobacco Co., Inc.
See id. “[A]ny disputed questions [of] fact and ambiguities in the controlling state law should be resolved ... in favor of the non-removing party.” Id., quoting Carriere v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 893 F.2d 98, 100 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 60 , 112 L.Ed.2d 35 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
ca4 1995
Id.; see Consolidated Freightways v. NLRB, 892 F.2d 1052, 1059 (D.C.Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 59 , 112 L.Ed.2d 34 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
ARA Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Id.; see Consolidated Freightways v. NLRB, 892 F.2d 1052, 1059 (D.C.Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 59 , 112 L.Ed.2d 34 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
David Burchett and Cheryl Burchett v. Cargill, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee v. Marine Equipment Management Corporation
See Carriere v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 893 F.2d 98, 100 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 60 , 112 L.Ed.2d 35 (1990); Bobby Jones Garden Apartments, Inc. v. Suleski, 391 F.2d 172, 177 (5th Cir.1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Iwag v. Geisel Compania Maritima, S.A.
See Carriere v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 893 F.2d 98, 101-02 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 60 , 112 L.Ed.2d 35 (1990). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Burchett v. Cargill, Inc.
See Carriere v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 893 F.2d 98, 100 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 60 , 112 L.Ed.2d 35 (1990); Bobby Jones Garden Apartments, Inc. v. Suleski, 391 F.2d 172, 177 (5th Cir.1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Northwest Resource Information Center, Inc. v. Northwest Power Planning Council
See United States v. Alpine Land and Reservoir Co., 887 F.2d 207, 213 (9th Cir.1989) (“Deference to an agency’s technical expertise and experience is particularly warranted with re spect to questions involving ... scientific matters.”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 60 , 112 L.Ed.2d 35 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
French v. State Farm Insurance
See Carriere v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 893 F.2d 98, 101-02 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 60 , 112 L.Ed.2d 35 (1990); Alcom Elec.
cited
Cited "see"
C. Jack Friedman, Ph.D. & Associates, P.C. v. Pennsylvania Blue Shield
See Friedrich v. Secretary of Health and Human Servs., 894 F.2d 829, 832-33 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 59 , 112 L.Ed.2d 34 (1990). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
Arzehgar v. Dixon
See Carriere v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 893 F.2d 98, 101-02 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 60 , 112 L.Ed.2d 35 (1990); Alcom Elec.
discussed
Cited "see"
Charter Township Of Huron v. Richards
See Friedrich v. Secretary of HHS, 894 F.2d 829, 834 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 59 , 112 L.Ed.2d 34 (1990), General Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F.2d 1561, 1565 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1074 , 105 S.Ct. 2153 , 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charter Township of Huron v. Richards
See Friedrich v. Secretary of HHS, 894 F.2d 829, 834 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 59 , 112 L.Ed.2d 34 (1990), General Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F.2d 1561, 1565 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1074 , 105 S.Ct. 2153 , 85 L.Ed.2d 509 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lane v. Champion International Corp.
See Veltmann v. Crowley Maritime Corp., 784 F.Supp. 366 (E.D.Tex.1992) (citing Carriere v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 893 F.2d 98, 100 (5th Cir.), cert. den., 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 60 , 112 L.Ed.2d 35 (1990)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mt. Graham Red Squirrel v. Espy
See United States v. Alpine Land and Reservoir Co., 887 F.2d 207, 213 (9th Cir.1989) ("Deference to an agency’s technical expertise and experience is particularly warranted with respect to questions involving . . . scientific matters."), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 60 , 112 L.Ed.2d 35 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mt. Graham Red Squirrel v. Espy
See United States v. Alpine Land and Reservoir Co., 887 F.2d 207, 213 (9th Cir.1989) ("Deference to an agency's technical expertise and experience is particularly warranted with respect to questions involving ... scientific matters."), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 60 , 112 L.Ed.2d 35 (1990). 10 The district court's conclusions of law rest on its interpretation of the AICA and are therefore reviewed de novo.
cited
Cited "see"
Haines v. National Union Fire Insurance
See Carriere v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 893 F.2d 98, 101-02 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 60 , 112 L.Ed.2d 35 (1990); Alcom Elec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Page v. State
(2×)
In Adams, the Court of Criminal Appeals noted that for the purposes of imputing knowledge to the prosecution, courts have “declined to draw a distinction between different agencies under the same government, focusing instead upon the ‘prosecution team’ which includes both investigative and prosecuto-rial personnel.” Ex parte Adams, 768 S.W.2d 281, 292 (Tex.Crim.App.1989) (citing United States v. Antone, 603 F.2d 566, 569 (5th Cir.1979)); see also Ex parte Brandley, 781 S.W.2d 886 , 892 n. 7 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cer t. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 61 , 112 L.Ed.2d 35 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sid Richardson Carbon & Gasoline Co. v. Interenergy Resources, Ltd.
Id. at 217 ; see also Carriere v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 893 F.2d 98, 100 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 60 , 112 L.Ed.2d 35 (1990) (observing that the removing party bears the burden of proving fraudulent joinder).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brady v. General Dynamics Corp.
Gould v. Artisoft, Inc., 1 F.3d 544 , 548 n. 1 (7th Cir.1993) (in testing removal petition, court may "consider the matter when the parties raise it” and is not restricted to plaintiff’s complaint); see also Carriere v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 893 F.2d 98, 100 (5th Cir.) cert. den. 498 U.S. 817 (1990) (court may consider affidavits and depositions in ruling on a motion to remand).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charlene Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit
See also Carriere v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 893 F.2d 98, 102 (5th Cir.) (affirming denial of Rule 56(f) continuance, recognizing that "plaintiffs were not ... entitled to have the trial judge rule on the motions in any particular order”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 60 , 112 L.Ed.2d 35 (1990). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dollar v. General Motors Corp.
Id. at 549 (emphasis in original); see also Carriere v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 893 F.2d 98, 100 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 817 , 111 S.Ct. 60 , 112 L.Ed.2d 35 (1990); Green v. Amerada Hess Corp., 707 F.2d 201, 205 (5th Cir.1983) (“The removing party must prove that there is absolutely no possibility that the plaintiff will be able to establish a cause of action against the in-state defendant in state court”) (emphasis added).
Null
v.
City of Lansing, Michigan
v.
City of Lansing, Michigan
No. 89-1877.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
498 U.S. 817
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.