green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
11.0 score
“we note that revocation of a physician's license is considered to be remedial under the double jeopardy clause”
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Luk v. Commonwealth
we note that revocation of a physician's license is considered to be remedial under the double jeopardy clause
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Zerkel
(2×)
revocation of physician's license is considered to be remedial under the double jeopardy clause
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
ca8 1993
e may affirm a judgment on any ground supported by the record even if not relied upon by the district court.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Maness v. Star-Kist Foods, Inc.
e may affirm a judgment on any ground supported by the record even if not relied upon by the district court.
cited
Cited "see"
Kewley v. Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
See Kvitka v. Board of Registration in Med., 407 Mass. 140,143 , cert, denied, 498 U.S. 823 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Minehan v. United States
See Girling Health Sys., Inc. v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 66, 72 (1990) (citing Diebold, Inc. v. United States, 891 F.2d 1579 (Fed.Cir.1989), cert denied, 498 U.S. 823 , 111 S.Ct. 73 , 112 L.Ed.2d 47 (1990)) ("Basically, plaintiff's damages claim is shaped by the tax benefits to which it claims entitlement.
cited
Cited "see"
Mississippi Chemical Corp. v. Dresser-Rand Co.
See Robinson v. Bump, 894 F.2d 758, 763 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 823 , 111 S.Ct. 73 , 112 L.Ed.2d 46 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jiricko v. Moser & Marsalek, P.C.
See United States v. Gurley, 43 F.3d 1188, 1199 (8th Cir.1994) (“Whether the present action is the ‘same cause of action’ as the prior action depends on whether it ‘arises out of the same nucleus of operative facts as the prior claim.’ ”) (quoting Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 742 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 823 , 111 S.Ct. 74 , 112 L.Ed.2d 48 (1990)), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 817 , 116 S.Ct. 73 , 133 L.Ed.2d 33 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wolf
See Halper, supra. In Kvitka v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 407 Mass. 140 , 551 N.E.2d 915 (1990), cert. denied 498 U.S. 823 , 111 S. Ct. 74 , 112 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Roberts v. Sullivan County (In Re Penking Trust)
See City Vending of Muskogee, Inc. v. *394 Oklahoma Tax Commission, 898 F.2d 122, 124-25 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 823 , 111 S.Ct. 75 , 112 L.Ed.2d 48 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re DEF Investments, Inc.
See generally Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 742 (8th Cir.) (claims arising out of the same nucleus of operative fact are to be given preclusive effect), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 823 , 111 S.Ct. 74 , 112 L.Ed.2d 48 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Leonard v. J.C. Pro Wear, Inc.
See Smith v. County of Albemarle, 895 F.2d 953, 954 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 823 (1990); Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3) However, the Pro Wear defendants admitted in their answer that Jeannine Leonard did purchase, with her husband, several interests in Pro Jersey kiosks, and the record evidence cited by the defendants to refute this jurisdictional fact does not establish that Mrs. Leonard owned no interest in any Pro Jersey location.
discussed
Cited "see"
Frances J. Davis Lavaughn T. Davis v. United States
See Smith v. County of Albemarle, 895 F.2d 953 (4th Cir.) (assertion, first raised on appeal, that plaintiffs lacked standing presented a question of jurisdiction vel non and thus had to be considered), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 823 (1990); Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3); see also National Org. for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler, 62 U.S.L.W. 4073, 4075 (U.S.1994) ("Standing represents a jurisdictional requirement which remains open to review at all stages of the litigation."). 7 District courts have original jurisdiction over "[a]ny civil action against the United States for the recovery of any internal-revenue…
cited
Cited "see"
Frank J. Taylor, Mary E. Taylor v. Linzy Martin
See Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 742 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 823 (1990). 2 Accordingly, we affirm.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cook
See Kvitka v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 407 Mass. 140 , 551 N.E.2d 915, 918 , cert, denied, 498 U.S. 823 , 111 S.Ct. 74 , 112 L.Ed.2d 47 (1990) (administrative fine imposed after physician’s guilty plea was punishment, court noting that licensing board characterized defendant’s actions as “‘a flagrant abuse of public trust’ ” and stated that “ ‘misconduct in the area of prescription practice will not be treated lightly5 ”).
cited
Cited "see"
VanDeWalle v. Albion National Bank
Accord, Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737 (8th Cir. 1990), cert, denied 498 U.S. 823 , 111 S. Ct. 74 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jet Sales West LLC v. City of El Paso
Tenn. 1990) (citations omitted); see also City Vending of Muskogee v. Oklahoma Tax Com’n, 898 F.2d 122, 125 (10th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 823 (1990) (bankruptcy courts have jurisdiction under § 505 to consider state tax issues if debtor failed to assert any challenge to the assessment prepetition or if the challenges were still pending on the petition date); In re B&B Marine Sales & Service, 149 B.R. 465, 466 (Bankr.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. Board of Registration in Medicine
See also Kvitka v. Board of Registration in Med., 407 Mass. 140, 143 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 823 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Peda v. Fort Dodge Animal Health, Inc.
Canady, 282 F.3d at 1014 (citing Hillary, 123 F.3d at 1044 n. 2, and NAACP v. Metropolitan Council, 125 F.3d 1171 , 1174 (8th Cir.1997)); see also Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 742 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 823 , 111 S.Ct. 74 , 112 L.Ed.2d 48 (1990); Murphy v. Jones, 877 F.2d 682, 684 (8th Cir.1989); Headley v. Bacon, 828 F.2d 1272, 1274 (8th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shumaker v. Iowa Department of Transportation
(2×)
United States v. Gurley, 43 F.3d 1188, 1195 (8th Cir.1994); see also Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 741 (8th Cir.) (“res judicata precludes the relit-igation of a claim on grounds that were raised or could have been raised in the prior action”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 823 , 111 S.Ct. 74 , 112 L.Ed.2d 48 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca8 1995
A prior judgment is binding " ' "not only as to every matter which was offered and received to sustain or defeat the claim or demand, but as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose." ' " Sea-Land Servs., Inc. v. Gaudet, 414 U.S. 573, 579 , 94 S.Ct. 806, 812 , 39 L.Ed.2d 9 (1974) (quoting Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U.S. 591, 597 , 68 S.Ct. 715, 719 , 92 L.Ed. 898 (1948) (quoting Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U.S. 351, 352 , 24 L.Ed. 195 (1876))); see also Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 741 (8th Cir.) ("res judicata precludes the relitigation of a claim on…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gurley
A prior judgment is binding “ ‘ “not only as to every matter which was offered and received to sustain or defeat the claim or demand, but as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose.” ’ ” Sea-Land Servs., Inc. v. Gaudet, 414 U.S. 573, 579 , 94 S.Ct. 806, 812 , 39 L.Ed.2d 9 (1974) (quoting Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U.S. 591, 597 , 68 S.Ct. 715, 719 , 92 L.Ed. 898 (1948) (quoting Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U.S. 351, 352 , 24 L.Ed. 195 (1876))); see also Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 741 (8th Cir.) (“res judicata precludes the relit-igatio…
Sexton, Individually and as Limited Guardian of the Separate Estate of Sexton, an Incapacitated Person
v.
Lone Star Life Insurance Co.
v.
Lone Star Life Insurance Co.
No. 89-1995.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.