green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Matthews v. State
See Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 495 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), ce rt. denied, 503 U.S. 911 , 112 S.Ct. 1278 , 117 L.Ed.2d 504 (1992) (appellant’s confession was sufficient to corroborate an accomplice, because the proof of the confession did not depend upon the testimony of the accomplice; an oral admission of guilt alone by appellant to a non-accomplice witness was sufficient evidence to convict him).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Paul Richard Green, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Watts, 950 F.2d 508, 514-15 (8th Cir.1991) (where indictment charged conspiracy to distribute heroin, cocaine, and cocaine base, and evidence of all three drugs introduced, verdict not ambiguous), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 911 , 112 S.Ct. 1276 , 117 L.Ed.2d 502 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Schultz
See Roach, 28 F.3d at 732 (citing United States v. Roenigk, 810 F.2d 809, 815 (8th Cir.1987) and United States v. Watts, 950 F.2d 508, 513 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 911 , 112 S.Ct. 1276 , 117 L.Ed.2d 502 (1991)); United States v. Wagoner, 713 F.2d 1371, 1376 (8th Cir.1983) (failure to object to evidence is a “waiver of any grounds of complaint to its admissibility”); United States v. Collins, 690 F.2d 670, 674 (8th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rady I. Sdoulam, Also Known as Rady I. Sduolam, Also Known as Roddy Ibrahim, Also Known as Rady A. Sdoulam
A single conspiracy “involves two or more persons agreeing to commit a criminal offense plus an act in furtherance of the conspiracy.” Adipietro, 983 F.2d at 1475 ; see also United States v. Watts, 950 F.2d 508, 512 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 911 , 112 S.Ct. 1276 , 117 L.Ed.2d 502 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Olesen v. Class
TTr 45-46; see Balfany, 965 F.2d at 580; Orelup, 492 N.W.2d at 106 ; see also, McCafferty v. Leapley, 944 F.2d 445, 449-52 (8th Cir.1991) (discussing these factors in the context of the residual exception to the hearsay rule and the Confrontation Clause), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 911 , 112 S.Ct. 1277 , 117 L.Ed.2d 503 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matchett v. State
(2×)
See e.g., Farris v. State, 819 S.W.2d 490, 497 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 911 , 112 S.Ct. 1278 , 117 L.Ed.2d 504 (1992); Fearance v. State, 620 S.W.2d 577, 584 (Tex.Crim.App.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 899 , 102 S.Ct. 400 , 70 L.Ed.2d 215 (1981); Heckert v. State, 612 S.W.2d 549, 552 (Tex.Crim.App.1981).
Lawson
v.
Lewis
v.
Lewis
No. 91-7020.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 2, 1992.
503 U.S. 911
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.