Carter v. Jones, 502 U.S. 852 (1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Carter v. Jones, 502 U.S. 852 (1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Peter Saunders (ca7, 1999-02-02)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Peter Saunders
7th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Smith, 928 F.2d 740, 741 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 852 , 112 S.Ct. 159 , 116 L.Ed.2d 124 (1991); Roberts, 915 F.2d at 890 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Mike Vassar
6th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Smith, 928 F.2d 740, 741-42 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 159 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Anthony L. Dean
6th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Smith, 928 F.2d 740 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 159 (1991). 56 In Smith, the trial judge had criticized defense counsel first in the jury's presence and subsequently at a sidebar conference.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Louis A. Kosma
3rd Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Smith, 928 F.2d 740, 744 (6th Cir.) *555 (“Some one ought to Take [the President] OUT AS IN ‘Death’ ”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 159 , 116 L.Ed.2d 124 (1991); United States v. Manning, 923 F.2d 83, 84 (8th Cir.) (“You can’t keep me from killing George Bush; One day I will have my chance, just watch and see.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2860 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1991); United States v. Mitchell, 812 F.2d 1250, 1252 (9th Cir.1987) (threatening remarks interspersed with claims that defendant was Gandhi and had a guerilla army in the Philippin…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Charles Glover
6th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
While a district court judge is expected to remain an impartial observer, this Court has recognized that “[m]uch of the concern about an otherwise inappropriate judicial act or remark is neutralized by the absence of the jury.” Morrow, 977 F.2d at 225 ; see also United States v. Smith, 928 F.2d 740, 741-43 (6th Cir.) (“to the extent the trial judge’s comments were otherwise objectionable, they were made in the main at the sidebar and therefore out of hearing of the jury”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 159 , 116 L.Ed.2d 124 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carter
v.
Jones, Warden
No. 90-8464.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
502 U.S. 852
Published

C. A. 6 th Cir. Certiorari denied.