green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Latta, Roger v. LaPorte County Sheri
See Buckley v. Fitzsimmons, 919 F.2d 1230 (7th Cir.1990) (Buckley I), remanded on other grounds, 502 U.S. 801 , 112 S.Ct. 40 , 116 L.Ed.2d 19 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. Bruner
See Buckley v. Fitzsimmons, 919 F.2d 1230, 1237 (7th Cir.1990) (vacated on other grounds by 502 U.S. 801 , 112 S.Ct. 40 , 116 L.Ed.2d 19 ); cf. Smith v. Benedict, 279 F.2d 211 (7th Cir.1960) (the term “claim” refers to a cause of action); Atkins, Kroll (Guam), Ltd. v. Cabrera, 277 F.2d 922, 924 (9th Cir.1960) (the term “claim” refers to a cause of action).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cooney v. White
(2×)
See, for example on this immunity issue where the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals apparently thought otherwise, Buckley v. Fitzsimmons, 919 F.2d 1230 (7th Cir.1990), cert. granted and judgment vacated in light of Burns, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 40 , 116 L.Ed.2d 19 (1991), remand 952 F.2d 965 (7th Cir.), cert. granted in part ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 53 , 121 L.Ed.2d 23 (1992). [2] The litigants would somewhat differently state that issue.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fittanto v. Klein
See Buckley v. Fitzsimmons, 919 F.2d 1230 (7th Cir.1990), vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of Burns v. Reed, 500 U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 1934 , 114 L.Ed.2d 547 , — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 40 , 116 L.Ed.2d 19 (1991), on remand 952 F.2d 965 (7th Cir.1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Soong v. University of Hawaii at Hilo
See Inaba v. Soong,_U.S.__ 112 S. Ct. 40 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DeCamp v. Douglas County Franklin Grand Jury
See, e.g., Buckley v. Fitzsimmons, 919 F.2d 1230, 1243 (7th Cir.1990), vacated and remanded, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 40 , 116 L.Ed.2d 19 (1991), adhered to on remand, 952 F.2d 965 (7th Cir.1992) (per curiam) (person indicted brought suit against prosecutors for their role in presenting the case to a grand jury; immunity for prosecutor upheld after reconsideration in light of Bums); Grant v. Hollenbach, 870 F.2d 1135 (6th Cir.1989) (person indicted brought suit against prosecutor for prosecutor’s acts in presenting facts to grand jury; immunity granted to prosecutor); Baez v. Hennessy, 853 F.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DeCamp v. Douglas County Franklin Grand Jury
See, e.g., Buckley v. Fitzsimmons, 919 F.2d 1230, 1243 (7th Cir.1990), vacated and remanded, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 40 , 116 L.Ed.2d 19 (1991), adhered to on remand, 952 F.2d 965 (7th Cir.1992) (per curiam) (person indicted brought suit against prosecutors for their role in presenting the case to a grand jury; immunity for prosecutor upheld after reconsideration in light of Burns ); Grant v. Hollenbach, 870 F.2d 1135 (6th Cir.1989) (person indicted brought suit against prosecutor for prosecutor's acts in presenting facts to grand jury; immunity granted to prosecutor); Baez v. Hennessy, 853 F…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ferraro v. Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human Services
The court noted that “[t]he ten-day limitation in section 1292(b) is not to be nullified by promiscuous grants of motions to amend.” Id.; see also Buckley v. Fitzsimmons, 919 F.2d 1230, 1239 (7th Cir.1990), cert. granted and judgment vacated on other grounds, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 40 , 116 L.Ed.2d 19 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Buckley
v.
Fitzsimmons
v.
Fitzsimmons
No. 90-7574.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and ease re[*802] manded for further consideration in light of Burns v. Reed, 500 U. S. 478 (1991).