green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.5 score
“a tying arrangement clearly exists here because the large price differential between the software support alone and the software/hardware maintenance package induces all rational buyers of prime's software support to accept its hardware maintenance”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
a tying arrangement clearly exists here because the large price differential between the software support alone and the software/hardware maintenance package induces all rational buyers of prime's software support to accept its hardware maintenance
discussed
Cited "see"
Dow Chemical Co. v. Ebling
(2×)
See Papas v. Zoecon Corp., 505 U.S. 1215 , 112 S.Ct. 3020 , 120 L.Ed.2d 892 (1992) (vacating & remanding Papas I ) and Arkansas-Platte & Gulf Partnership v. Dow Chemical Co., 506 U.S. 910 , 113 S.Ct. 314 , 121 L.Ed.2d 235 (1992) (vacating and remanding Arkansas-Platte & Gulf Partnership I ).
cited
Cited "see"
McAlpine v. Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co.
See Arkansas-Platte & Gulf Partnership v. Dow Chemical Co. (1992), 506 U.S. 910 , 113 S.Ct. 314 , 121 L.Ed.2d 235 ; Papas v. Zoecon Corp. (1992), 505 U.S. 1215 , 112 S.Ct. 3020 , 120 L.Ed.2d 892 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. Smith
See Virtual Maintenance Inc. v. Prime Computer, Inc., 957 F.2d 1318, 1324 (6th Cir.1992) (extreme price differential meant that all rational buyers were forced to accept tied product), vacated on other grounds, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 314 , 121 L.Ed.2d 235 (1992); Bell v. Cherokee Aviation Corp., 660 F.2d 1123, 1131 (6th Cir.1981) (defendant admitted to tying arrangement based upon provisions of lease and sub-lease).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Stilwell v. Ozarks Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.
(2×)
See Arkansas-Platte & Gulf v. Van Waters & Rogers, 959 F.2d 158 , 161 (10th Cir.), vacated on other grounds , — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 314 , 121 L.Ed.2d 235 (1992) (the burden is on the defendants to show that state tort claims based on failure to warn are preempted by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Ro-denticide Act).
cited
Cited "see"
Quad R Farms v. American Cyanamid Co.
See — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 314 , 121 L.Ed.2d 235 (1992) (Arkansas-Platte); -U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3020 , 120 L.Ed.2d 892 (1992) (Papas). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
DerGazarian v. Dow Chemical Co.
See Arkansas-Platte, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 314 , 121 L.Ed.2d 235 (1992); and Papas, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 3020 , 120 L.Ed.2d 892 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Levesque v. Miles Inc.
See Arkansas-Platte & Gulf Partnership v. Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. (“Arkansas-Platte I ”), 959 F.2d 158, 164 (10th Cir.), vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 314 , 121 L.Ed.2d 235 (1992); Papas v. Upjohn Co., 926 F.2d 1019, 1026 (11th Cir.1991), vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3020 , 120 L.Ed.2d 892 (1992). 4 However, in Ferebee v. Chevron Chemical Company, 736 F.2d 1529, 1542-43 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brokerage Concepts v. US Healthcare Inc (Part II)
See Town Sound, 959 F.2d at 493 (requiring foreclosure of a “substantial portion” of the tied market to hurt competition.); see also Virtual Maintenance, Inc. v. Prime Computer, Inc., 957 F.2d 1318, 1330 (6th Cir.) (“[t]he foreclosure of 400 computer systems out of the thousands of systems [in the tied market] is insignificant as a matter of law”), vacated, 506 U.S. 910 , 113 S.Ct. 314 , 121 L.Ed.2d 235 *520 (1992), reinstated in pertinent part, 11 F.3d 660, 663-64 (6th Cir.1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eldon S. REED
v.
Victoria C. DRUMMOND, Trustee
v.
Victoria C. DRUMMOND, Trustee
No. 92-96.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1992.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1) · S.D. New York (1)
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Patterson v. Shumate, 504 U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 2242, 119 L.Ed.2d 519 (1992).