green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Folden v. United States
the instant case involves a regulatory action in a highly regulated industry in which the government took actions that reasonably should have been expected by plaintiffs ....
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Kesselring, and Aizawa Gyogyo, K.K., Intervenor-Appellant v. F/t Arctic Hero
E.g., Ruckelshaus, 467 U.S. at 1005-09 , 104 S.Ct. at 2874-76 (disclosure of valuable data by EPA is not a taking where owner was aware that data was subject to disclosure and voluntarily submitted data to EPA); see California Housing Securities, Inc. v. United States, 959 F.2d 955, 958-60 (Fed.Cir.) (RTC’s possession of savings and loan not a taking because savings and loan knew that, by applying for federal deposit insurance, it was potentially subject to occupation by RTC pursuant to federal regulations), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 324 , 121 L.Ed.2d 244 (1992). *1127 Because the …
cited
Cited "see"
Howard B. Weissman v. Phillip Weener, Individually and D/B/A Weener & Associates
See Hamilton v. Komatsu Dresser Industries, Inc., 964 F.2d 600 , 603 n. 1 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 324 , 121 L.Ed.2d 244 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Kupferschmidt v. Runyon
See Hamilton v. Komatsu Dresser Industries, Inc., 964 F.2d 600, 605-06 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 324 , 121 L.Ed.2d 244 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maritrans Inc. v. United States
See, e.g., Branch v. United States, 69 F.3d 1571 (Fed.Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 55 , 136 L.Ed.2d 18 (1996); Golden Pacific Bancorp, v. United States, 15 F.3d 1066, 1073-74 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 961 , 115 S.Ct. 420 , 130 L.Ed.2d 335 (1994); see also California Housing Securities, Inc. v. United States, 959 F.2d 955 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 916 , 113 S.Ct. 324 , 121 L.Ed.2d 244 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doctor Virginia Naples Kelecic v. Board of Regency Universities, a Body Politic Doing Business as Northern Illinois University
Equitable estoppel "comes into play if the defendant takes active steps to prevent the plaintiff from suing in time, as by promising not to plead the statute of limitations." Cada, 920 F.2d at 451 ; Chakonas v. City of Chicago, 42 F.3d 1132, 1135 (7th Cir.1994); see also Hamilton v. Dresser Indus., Inc., 964 F.2d 600 , 605 (7th Cir.) (active steps are "either of a deliberate design by the employer or of actions that an employer should unmistakably have understood would cause the employee to delay filing" an EEOC charge), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 324 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
66 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1164, 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,406 Nestor Chakonas v. City of Chicago, City of Chicago Police Department, Leroy Martin, in His Official Capacity
Sec. 626 (d)(2); see also Hamilton v. Komatsu Dresser Industries, Inc., 964 F.2d 600, 603 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 324 , 121 L.Ed.2d 244 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chakonas v. City of Chicago
It is undisputed that Chakonas’s claim was not filed within the required statutory period. 1 The ADEA requires potential plaintiffs to file a complaint with the EEOC within 300 days of the alleged discriminatory practice. 29 U.S.C. § 626 (d)(2); see also Hamilton v. Komatsu Dresser Industries, Inc., 964 F.2d 600, 603 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 324 , 121 L.Ed.2d 244 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CALIFORNIA HOUSING SECURITIES, INC.
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 92-151.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1992.
113 S. Ct. 324
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Federal Claims (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Denied.