green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Jenny Wernsing v. Department of Human Services, State of Illinois
See Aldrich v. Randolph Central School District, 963 F.2d 520 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 965 , 113 S.Ct. 440 , 121 L.Ed.2d 359 (1992) (with three Justices dissenting); EEOC v. J.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Wernsing, Jenny v. Dept. Human Services
See Aldrich v. Randolph Central School District, 963 F.2d 520 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 965 (1992) (with three Justices dissenting); EEOC v. J.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrews v. State
See United States v. Langston, 970 F.2d 692, 697-98 (10th Cir.), cert. denied Francis v. United States, 506 U.S. 965 , 113 S.Ct. 439 , 121 L.Ed.2d 358 (1992), and cert. denied McIlroy v. United States, 506 U.S. 979 , 113 S.Ct. 479 , 121 L.Ed.2d 384 (1992), and cert. denied Ross v. United States, 506 U.S. 986 , 113 S.Ct. 495 , 121 L.Ed.2d 433 (1992), and cert, denied McIlroy v. United States, 507 U.S. 1040 , 113 S.Ct. 1872 , 123 L.Ed.2d 491 (1993). [¶25) Gehnert, 956 P.2d at 861 , provides guidance in resolving the consent issue because the facts of that case are similar to those presented in …
cited
Cited "see"
Buehl v. Vaughn
See United States v. Gross, 961 F.2d 1097, 1106 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 965 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Buehl v. Vaughn
(2×)
See United States v. Gross, 961 F.2d 1097, 1108 (3d Cir.1992) (citing United States v. Swinehart, 617 F.2d 336, 339 (3d Cir.1980)), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 965 , 113 S.Ct. 439 , 121 L.Ed.2d 358 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Buehl v. Vaughn
(2×)
See United States v. Gross, 961 F.2d 1097, 1108 (3d Cir.1992) (citing United States v. Swinehart, 617 F.2d 336, 339 (3d Cir.1980)), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 965 , 113 S.Ct. 439 , 121 L.Ed.2d 358 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mario Martinez, United States of America v. Steven Cox, A/K/A Bobby
(2×)
See United States v. Crippen, 961 F.2d 882, 885 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 965 , 113 S.Ct. 438 , 121 L.Ed.2d 358 (1992). 40 Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is 41 AFFIRMED.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dosal
See United States v. Langston, 970 F.2d 692, 705-06 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 965 (1992.) A conviction based on 18 U.S.C. § 2 requires proof (1) the defendant willfully associated himself with a criminal venture, i.e., possession of cocaine with intent to distribute; (2) the defendant participated in the venture as something that he wished to bring about; (3) the defendant sought by his action to make the venture succeed; and (4) someone other than the defendant committed the offense with the aid of the defendant.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Salvador Dosal
See United States v. Langston, 970 F.2d 692, 705-06 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 965 (1992.) A conviction based on 18 U.S.C. § 2 requires proof (1) the defendant willfully associated himself with a criminal venture, i.e., possession of cocaine with intent to distribute; (2) the defendant participated in the venture as something that he wished to bring about; (3) the defendant sought by his action to make the venture succeed; and (4) someone other than the defendant committed the offense with the aid of the defendant.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Grey
(2×)
See United States v. Gross, 961 F.2d 1097, 1107 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 965 , 113 S.Ct. 439 , 121 L.Ed.2d 358 (1992); Government of Virgin Islands v. Edwards, 903 F. 2d 267, 271 (3d Cir.1990); United States v. Messerlian, 832 F.2d 778, 797 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 988 , 108 S.Ct. 1291 , 99 L.Ed.2d 501 (1988); Hoheb, supra, 777 F.2d at 142 .
cited
Cited "see"
GRIJALVA
See Powell v. C.I.R., 958 F.2d 53 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 965 (1992); United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc., 272 U.S. 1 (1926).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sledge v. Stoldt
Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 158-59 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); see also Aldrich v. Randolph Central School District, 963 F.2d 520, 523 (2d Cir.1992) (court is required to “resolve all ambiguities and draw all inferences in favor of the nonmoving party”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 965 , 113 S.Ct. 440 , 121 L.Ed.2d 359 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bereano
The only issue is whether there is a plan, scheme or artifice intended to defraud."), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 919 (1980); see also United States v. Maxwell, 920 F.2d 1028, 1036 (D.C. _________________________________________________________________ Cir. 1987))), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 965 (1992); United States v. Utz, 886 F.2d 1148, 1150 (9th Cir. 1989) (requiring "an intent to obtain money or property from the victim of the deceit." (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1005 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Angel-Martinez
See, e.g., United States v. Crippen, 9 61 F.2d 882 , 885 (9th Cir.) (“[t]he receipt of ineffective assistance of counsel is simply not a ‘mitigating or aggravating’ circumstance”), cer t. denied, 506 U.S. 965 , 113 S.Ct. 438 , 121 L.Ed.2d 358 (1992); United States v. Clark, 8 F.3d 839, 842 (D.C.Cir.1993) (unique ability of District of Columbia prosecutor to decide whether to prosecute in federal or local court “is not a mitigating factor within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (b)”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doria v. Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn, Inc.
EQUAL PAY ACT CLAIM To establish a prima facie case under the Equal Pay Act (“EPA”), a plaintiff must demonstrate: “i) the employer pays different wages to employees of the opposite sex; ii) the employees perform equal work on jobs requiring equal skill, effort, and responsibility; and iii) the jobs are performed under similar working conditions.” Tomka v. Seiler Corp., 66 F.3d 1295, 1310 (2d Cir.1995) (citations omitted); see also Aldrich v. Randolph Central School District, 963 F.2d 520, 524 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 965 , 113 S.Ct. 440 , 121 L.Ed.2d 359 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Burgos
See, e.g., United States v. Langston, 970 F.2d 692, 706 (10th Cir.) (affirming a narcotics con- spiracy conviction because the defendant was present at the location where the laboratory used to manufacture narcotics was operating, the odor of chemicals was prominent at the location, the defendant's car at one point reeked of ether, there was testimony that "all" involved persons had overseen the laboratory, and defendant's fingerprint was on laboratory instruments), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 965 (1992); United States v. Aichele, 941 F.2d 761, 763 (9th Cir. 1991) (noting that defendant's fingerpri…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frank Kahled Burgos, United States of America v. Alexio Burnard Gobern
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Langston, 970 F.2d 692, 706 (10th Cir.) (affirming a narcotics conspiracy conviction because the defendant was present at the location where the laboratory used to manufacture narcotics was operating, the odor of chemicals was prominent at the location, the defendant’s car at one point reeked of ether, there was testimony that “all” involved persons had overseen the laboratory, and defendant’s fingerprint was on laboratory instruments), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 965 , 113 S.Ct. 439 , 121 L.Ed.2d 358 (1992); United States v. Aichele, 941 F.2d 761, 763 (9th Cir.1…
Crippen
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-6083.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 2, 1992.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.