green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Goodgame v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co.
See Bank South Leasing, Inc. v. Williams, 778 F.2d 704, 707 (11th Cir.1985) (remanding for new trial where evidence existed in support of different result given a properly-instructed jury); Johnson v. Bryant, 671 F.2d 1276, 1280 (11th Cir.1982) (stating that reversal is warranted where we are left with “a substantial and ineradicable doubt” as to whether the jury was properly guided in its deliberations) (citation omitted); but see Mojica v. Gannett Co., 7 F.3d 552, 560 (7th Cir.1993) (declining to remand for new trial under proper version of § 1981 where plaintiff presented no evidence d…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bentley v. Glickman
(2×)
See Gersman v. Group Health Ass’n, Inc., 725 F.Supp. 573, 577 (D.D.C.1989) (president and principal shareholder did not have standing to bring 42 U.S.C. § 1981 claim to redress discrimination injury to corporation), aff'd, 931 F.2d 1565 (D.C.Cir.1991), vacated on other grounds, 502 U.S. 1068 , 112 S.Ct. 960 , 117 L.Ed.2d 127 , adhered to, on remand, 975 F.2d 886 (D.C.Cir.1992), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1068 , 114 S.Ct. 1642 , 128 L.Ed.2d 363 (1994); Gregory v. Mitchell, 634 F.2d 199, 202 (5th Cir.1981) (officers and shareholders do not have standing to bring 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights act…
discussed
Cited "see"
Cardinal Towing & Auto Repair, Inc. v. CITY OF BEDFORD, TX
(2×)
See Gersman v. Group Health Ass’n, Inc., 931 F.2d 1565, 1568-70 (D.C.Cir.1991), vacated on other grounds, 502 U.S. 1068 , 112 S.Ct. 960 , 117 L.Ed.2d 127 , reinstated 975 F.2d 886 (1992), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1068 , 114 S.Ct. 1642 , 128 L.Ed.2d 363 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Indiana Civil Rights Commission v. Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co.
(2×)
"One kind is evidence that can be interpreted as an acknowledgment of discriminatory intent by the defendant or its agents." Troupe, 20 F.3d at 736 ; see Mojica v. Gannett Co. (1993), 7th Cir., 7 F.3d 552 , 561 cert. denied, - U.S. --, 114 S.Ct. 1643 , 128 L.Ed.2d 363 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gina PIRAINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL ORIENTATION RESOURCES, INC., Defendant-Appellee
See also Mojica v. Gannett Co., 7 F.3d 552, 561 (7th Cir.1993) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1643 , 128 L.Ed.2d 363 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert D. Rapaport v. United States Department of the Treasury, Office of Thrift Supervision
(2×)
See, e.g., Gersman v. Group Health Ass’n, Inc., 975 F.2d 886, 897 (D.C.Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1642 , 128 L.Ed.2d 363 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lillian D. WOOLF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Erskine B. BOWLES, Administrator, Small Business Administration, Defendant-Appellee
Edwards v. Lujan, 40 F.3d 1152 , 1154 n. 1 (10th Cir.1994); see also Huey v. Sullivan, 971 F.2d 1362, 1365 (8th Cir.1992) (pre-Landgraf case holding that section 114 does not apply retroactively), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1642, 128 L.Ed.2d 363 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gregory Harper v. Godfrey Company and D.B. Barcom, Incorporated
See, e.g., Mojica v. Gannett Co., 7 F.3d 552, 560 (7th Cir.1993) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1643 , 128 L.Ed.2d 363 (1994); Harriston v. Chicago Tribune Co., 992 F.2d 697, 702 (7th Cir.1993); Partee, 954 F.2d at 457 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones Truck Lines, Inc. v. Marathon Electric Manufacturing Corp. (In re Jones Truck Lines, Inc.)
See also Mojica v. Gannett Co., Inc., 7 F.3d 552, 559 (7th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 1643 , 128 L.Ed.2d 363 (1994) (“a statute may include certain procedural or damage provisions which do not impact substantive rights, and therefore should apply to” cases pending at the time of enactment); Mozee v. American Commercial Marine Serv.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca7 1994
Id. at 1137 ; see also Mojica v. Gannett Co., 7 F.3d 552, 560 (7th Cir.1993) (en banc) ("under the former law the jury was allowed to make factual findings if Title VII claims were tried with section 1981 claims."), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1643 , 128 L.Ed.2d 363 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dombeck v. Milwaukee Valve Co.
Id. at 1137 ; see also Mojica v. Gannett Co., 7 F.3d 552, 560 (7th Cir.1993) (en banc) (“under the former law the jury was allowed to make factual findings if Title VII claims were tried with section 1981 claims.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1643 , 128 L.Ed.2d 363 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones Truck Lines, Inc. v. Phoenix Products Co.
See also Mojica v. Gannett Co., Inc., 7 F.3d 552, 559 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1643 , 128 L.Ed.2d 363 (1994) (“a statute may include certain procedural or damage provisions which do not impact substantive rights, and therefore should apply to” cases pending at the time of enactment); Mozee v. American Commercial Marine Serv.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Watson v. Amedco Steel, Inc.
In Castleman v. Acme Boot Co., 959 F.2d 1417, 1421 (7th Cir.1992), we explained that “[o]nce a trial has been conducted, [we] will not decide whether a plaintiff has met her burden of making a prima facie case, or whether a defendant has met the alternate burden of producing evidence of a legitimate rationale for discharge.” (Emphasis added); see also Mojica v. Gannett Co., 7 F.3d 552, 561 (7th Cir.1993) (en banc) (“once the plaintiff prevails before a jury, the method of proof becomes extraneous”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1643 , 128 L.Ed.2d 363 (1994); EEOC v. Century Broa…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca7 1994
In Castleman v. Acme Boot Co., 959 F.2d 1417, 1421 (7th Cir.1992), we explained that "[o]nce a trial has been conducted, [we] will not decide whether a plaintiff has met her burden of making a prima facie case, or whether a defendant has met the alternate burden of producing evidence of a legitimate rationale for discharge." (Emphasis added); see also Mojica v. Gannett Co., 7 F.3d 552, 561 (7th Cir.1993) (en banc) ("once the plaintiff prevails before a jury, the method of proof becomes extraneous"), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1643 , 128 L.Ed.2d 363 (1994); EEOC v. Century Broadcast…
Hicks
v.
Brown Group, Inc., dba Brown Shoe Co., Inc.
v.
Brown Group, Inc., dba Brown Shoe Co., Inc.
No. 92-1538.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 2, 1994.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.