green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.1 score
“court will invoke its discretion and deny the reopening of a bankruptcy case 'where it appears that to do so would be futile and a waste of judicial resources.”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Murphy-Taylor v. Hofmann
But see Morgan v. Ford, 6 F.3d 750, 754-55 (11th Cir.1993) (holding that employee's complaints of sexual harassment were designed to improve her own working conditions, rather than to raise issues of public concern), cert, denied, 512 U.S. 1221 , 114 S.Ct. 2708 , 129 L.Ed.2d 836 (1994).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Aero-Fab, Inc.
court will invoke its discretion and deny the reopening of a bankruptcy case 'where it appears that to do so would be futile and a waste of judicial resources.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lopez v. First Judicial District of Pennsylvania (In re Lopez)
See Thompson v. Commonwealth (In re Thompson), 16 F.3d 576, 581 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1221 , 114 S.Ct. 2709 , 129 L.Ed.2d 836 (1994); State of Tennessee v. Hollis (In re Hollis), 810 F.2d 106, 108-109 (6th Cir.1987); In re Zarzynski, 771 F.2d 304, 306 (7th Cir.1985) To the extent there exists contrary authority, it involves not § 523 but § 1328, which contains a narrower non-discharge-ability provision as to criminal debts.
discussed
Cited "see"
Drake v. State
See In re Thompson, 16 F.3d 576, 577-78 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1221 , 114 S.Ct. 2709 , 129 L.Ed.2d 836 (1994) (holding that any condition a state criminal court imposes as part of a criminal sentence is not dischargeable in bankruptcy); United States v. Vetter, 895 F.2d 456, 459 (8th Cir.1990) (stating that criminal restitution orders are exempt from discharge in bankruptcy proceedings); In re Warfel, 268 B.R. 205, 213 (9th Cir. BAP 2001) (holding that because the restitution was ordered as part of a state criminal prose-ecution, it was excepted from discharge in bankruptey); S…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Garnett
(2×)
See Thompson v. Commonwealth, 16 F.3d 576, 577 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1221 , 114 S.Ct. 2709 , 129 L.Ed.2d 836 (1994) (holding that “any condition a state criminal court imposes as part of a criminal sentence is not dischargeable in bankruptcy”); U.S. v. Vetter, 895 F.2d 456, 459 (8th Cir.1990) (stating that criminal restitution orders are exempt from discharge in bankruptcy proceedings); Warfel v. City of Saratoga, 268 B.R. 205, 213 (9th Cir. BAP 2001) (holding that because the restitution was ordered as part of a state criminal prosecution it was excepted from discharge in…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. 162 MegaMania Gambling Devices
See Cabazon Band of Mission Indians v. National Indian Gaming Comm’n, 827 F.Supp. 26, 27 (D.D.C.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1221 , 114 S.Ct. 2709 , 129 L.Ed.2d 836 (1994) (Cabazon II).
discussed
Cited "see"
Telecomm Technical Services, Inc. v. Siemens Rolm Communications, Inc.
See Tarrant Service Agency, Inc. v. American Standard, Inc., 12 F.3d 609, 617 (6th Cir.1993) (holding that manufacturer of HVAC equipment acted unilaterally where it prohibited independently-owned and company-owned distributors of its parts from selling to independent repair companies), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1221 , 114 S.Ct. 2709 , 129 L.Ed.2d 836 (1994); International Logistics Group, Ltd. v. Chrysler Corp., 884 F.2d 904 (6th Cir.1989), (reasoning that concerted action cannot be inferred simply from the existence of a manufacturer’s marketing policies and a distributor’s compliance with …
cited
Cited "see"
Badia v. City of Miami
See Tindal, 32 F.3d at 1539 (citing Morgan v. Ford, 6 F.3d 750, 754-55 (11th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1221 (1994)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Badia v. City of Miami
See Tindal, 32 F.3d at 1539 (citing Morgan v. Ford, 6 F.3d 750, 754-55 (11th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1221 , 114 S.Ct. 2708 , 129 L.Ed.2d 836 (1994)). *1446 In an attempt to distinguish her speech from private grievances seeking redress for personal harm, Badia contends that her complaints deserve First Amendment protection because she filed a claim with the EEOC and a suit in federal court.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca11 1998
See Tindal, 32 F.3d at 1539 (citing Morgan v. Ford, 6 F.3d 750, 754-55 (11th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1221 , 114 S.Ct. 2708 , 129 L.Ed.2d 836 (1994)). 6 In an attempt to distinguish her speech from private grievances seeking redress for personal harm, Badia contends that her complaints deserve First Amendment protection because she filed a claim with the EEOC and a suit in federal court.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harrison Aire, Inc. v. Aerostar International, Inc.
See, e.g., U.S. Anchor Mfg., Inc. v. Rule Indus., 7 F.3d 986 , 997-98 (11th Cir.1993) (considerably more expensive anchor excluded from broader market of functionally interchangeable but up to 50% less expensive anchors), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1221 , 114 S.Ct. 2710 , 129 L.Ed.2d 837 (1994); Woods Exploration & Producing Co. v. Aluminum Co. of Am., 438 F.2d 1286, 1305-07 (5th Cir.1971) (concluding that single natural gas field constituted relevant market), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1047 , *215 92 S.Ct. 701 , 30 L.Ed.2d 736 (1972); Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Arch Assocs.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barron v. Public Health Trust of Dade County
See, e.g., Morgan v. Ford, 6 F.3d 750, 755 (11th Cir.1993) (establishing constructive discharge requires plaintiff to show that his “ ‘working conditions were so intolerable that a reasonable person ... would be compelled to resign’ ”) (quoting Steele v. Offshore Shipbuilding, Inc., 867 F.2d 1311, 1317 (11th Cir.1989)), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1221 , 114 S.Ct. 2708 , 129 L.Ed.2d 836 (1994); Hughes, 994 F.Supp. at 1405 (noting that “a constructive discharge occurs when an employer makes working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person in the employee’s position would have f…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lobeck v. City of Riviera Beach
See also United States Anchor Mfg., Inc. v. Rule Indus., Inc., 7 F.3d 986 , 993 n. 11 (11th Cir.1993) (Federal common law determines effect of settlement with respect to federal antitrust claims), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1221 , 114 S.Ct. 2710 , 129 L.Ed.2d 837 (1994); Fulgence v. J.
Daneshmand
v.
R. B. Hazard, Inc.
v.
R. B. Hazard, Inc.
No. 93-1754.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 1994.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. West Virginia (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.