green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Whitlow v. VISITING NURSE ASS'N OF WESTERN NY
See Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 32 F.3d 718, 723 (2d Cir.1994) (“An impairment that disqualifies a person from only a narrow range of jobs is not considered a substantially limiting one.”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995); Wernick v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 91 F.3d 379, 383-84 (2d Cir.1996) (finding holding in Heilweil consistent with the language of § 1630.2(j)(3)(I)); Adams v. Rochester General Hospital, 977 F.Supp. 226, 232 (W.D.N.Y.1997) (to succeed on ADA claim, plaintiff must show his impairment substantially limited his ability to…
cited
Cited "see"
Banks v. Potter
See Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hasp., 32 F.3d 718, 721 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ragan v. JEFFBOAT, LLC
See Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 32 F.3d 718, 721-22 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995); Cochrum v. Old Ben Coal Co., 102 F.3d 908, 911 (7th Cir.1996). 11 .
cited
Cited "see"
ca2 2000
See Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 32 F.3d 718, 722 (2d Cir. 1994) (interpreting Rehabilitation Act), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Staten Island Savings Bank
See Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 32 F.3d 718, 722 (2d Cir.1994) (interpreting Rehabilitation Act), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zarzycki v. United Technologies Corp.
The regulations further provide that the “inability to perform a single, particular job does not constitute a substantial limitation in the major life activity of working.” 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2 (j)(3)(i); see Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 32 F.3d 718, 723-24 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995); see also Wooten v. Farmland Foods, 58 F.3d 382, 386 (8th Cir.1995) (stating that working “does not mean working at a particular job of that person’s choice”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kidwell v. Board of County Com'rs of Shawnee County
See Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 32 F.3d 718, 723 (2nd Cir.1994), ce rt. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995); see also Rhoads v. F.D.I.C., 956 F.Supp. 1239, 1247 (D.Md.1997) ("[W]here the additional major life activities which the plaintiff claims are substantially limited, such as the ability to ‘breathe,’ are all triggered solely by her workplace environment, the traditional approach found in the ADA for determining whether such impairments are sufficiently severe to be classified as a disability appears inadequate.
cited
Cited "see"
Sarno v. Douglas Elliman-Gibbons & Ives, Inc.
See Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 32 F.3d 718, 722 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Keck v. New York State Office of Alcoholism & Substance Abuse Services
See Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hospital, 32 F.3d 718, 723 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995) (citation omitted). 2 Plaintiff has therefore failed as a matter of law to demonstrate that her ability to breathe is substantially impaired under the ADA.
cited
Cited "see"
Glowacki v. Buffalo General Hospital
See Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 32 F.3d 718, 722 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Meling v. St. Francis College
See Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hospital, 32 F.3d 718, 722 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Stuart v. Danka Corp.
See Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 32 F.3d 718, 722 (2d.Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Gearan
Furthermore, "[t]he inability to perform a single, particular job does not constitute a substantial limitation in the major life activity of working.” 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2 (j)(3)(i); see Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hospital, 32 F.3d 718, 723 (2d Cir.1994) ("An impairment that disqualifies a person from only a narrow range of jobs is not considered a substantially limiting one,” so that an employee with asthma who was discharged because she could no longer work in the basement was not disabled), cert, denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Henderson v. New York Life, Inc.
See Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 32 F.3d 718, 723-24 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995) (applying analogous Rehabilitation Act); Mobley v. Board of Regents of the Univ.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Murphy v. Board of Education of the Rochester City School District
RECAP, 294 F.3d at 48-49; Parker v. Columbia Pictures Indus., 204 F.3d 326 , 337 (2d Cir.2000); First Step, Inc. v. City of New London, 247 F.Supp.2d 135, 150 (D.Conn.2003); see also Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 32 F.3d 718, 722 (2d Cir.1994) (setting forth elements of prima facie case under Rehabilitation Act), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Heiman v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
The expert disregarded Mr. Heiman’s college degree when assessing job availability and loss. 7 See Bolton, 36 F.3d at 944 (recognizing evidence did not address plaintiff’s “vocational training”); see also Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 32 F.3d 718, 724 (2d Cir.1994) (concluding plaintiff was not hindered in her ability to work because she possessed advanced education degrees), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gibson v. Henderson
See id.; see, e.g., Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 32 F.3d 718, 722 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Douglas v. Victor Capital Group
Burdine, 450 U.S. at 252-53 , 101 S.Ct. at 1093 (quoting and citing McDonnell Douglas); see also, e.g., Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 32 F.3d 718, 722 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995); Johnson v. St.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dipol v. New York City Transit Authority
See also Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 32 F.3d 718, 721-22 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995); Christopher v. Laidlaw Transit Inc., 899 F.Supp. 1224, 1226-27 (S.D.N.Y.1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jessica Ryan v. Grae & Rybicki, P.C.
Co., 997 F.2d 1028, 1035 (2d Cir.1993); see also Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 32 F.3d 718, 722 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1147 , 115 S.Ct. 1095 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1063 (1995).
Langguth
v.
McCuen, Secretary of the State of Arkansas
v.
McCuen, Secretary of the State of Arkansas
No. 94-829.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1995.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.