green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1996 ·
…ases following nettles apply the rule only to a magistrate judge's findings of fact and not to his conclusions of law
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association
ases following nettles apply the rule only to a magistrate judge's findings of fact and not to his conclusions of law
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
PAUL W. DOUGLASS v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION
ases following nettles apply the rule only to a magistrate judge's findings of fact and not to his conclusions of law
discussed
Cited "see"
Savage v. Barnhart
Frivolous, conclusive or general objections need not be considered by the district court.” Id. at 410 n. 8; accord United States v. Carrillo-Morales, 21 F.3d 1054, 1061 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1178 , 115 S.Ct. 1163 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1119 (1995). 1 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Barnhart
Frivolous, conclusive or general objections need not be considered by the district court.” Id. at 410 n. 8; accord United States v. Carrillo-Morales, 27 F.3d 1054, 1061 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1178 , 115 S.Ct. 1163 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1119 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. McIntosh
See United States v. Carrillo-Morales, 27 F.3d 1054, 1067 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1178 , 115 S.Ct. 1163 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1119 (1995); United States v. Aguilera-Zapata, 901 F.2d 1209, 1213-14 (5th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan
See United States v. Richmond, 37 F.3d 418, 419 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1178 , 115 S.Ct. 1163 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1119 (1995) (police responded to a complaint of Richmond threatening neighbors by brandishing gun and subsequently discover loaded gun and drugs); United States v. Bost, 968 F.2d 729, 732 (8th Cir.1992) (government must prove the relationship); Khang, 904 F.2d at 1221 -1223 *222 (finding that the government 'stipulated that the firearm had no relationship to the crime).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Threadgill
See United States v. Carrillo-Morales, 27 F.3d 1054, 1060-61 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1178 , 115 S.Ct. 1163 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1119 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Threadgill
See United States v. Carrillo-Morales, 27 F.3d 1054, 1060-61 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1178 , 115 S.Ct. 1163 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1119 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jack Shelly
See id. (standard of review); cf. United States v. Williams, 10 F.3d 590, 595-96 (8th Cir. 1993) (where residence was used for drug dealing, sufficient nexus existed between weapon found in second-floor bedroom and drugs found in first-floor kitchen); United States v. Hammer, 3 F.3d 266, 270 (8th Cir. 1993) (presence of guns in house where drugs were packaged and sold was sufficient), cert. denied, 114 S. ct. 1121 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jack Shelly
See id. (standard of review); cf. United States v. Williams, 10 F.3d 590, 595-96 (8th Cir.1993) (where residence was used for drug dealing, sufficient nexus existed between weapon found in second-floor bedroom and drugs found in first-floor kitchen); United States v. Hammer, 3 F.3d 266, 270 (8th Cir.1993) (presence of guns in house where drugs were packaged and sold was sufficient), cert. denied, 114 S. ct. 1121 (1994). 3 Finally, the district court's statements at sentencing indicate the judge was aware of his authority to depart under § 2K2.0.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank O. Hogan
See United States v. Richmond, 37 F.3d 418, 419 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1163 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Orlando Hogan, Also Known as David Harris
See United States v. Richmond, 37 F.3d 418, 419 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 1163 (1995). 5 The gun was found in close proximity to a large amount of crack, which Hogan admitted he was going to help Huff distribute.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Ward
See United States v. Richmond, 37 F.3d 418, 419 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1163 (1995); United States v. 1 The HONORABLE CHARLES A. SHAW, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Ward
See United States v. Richmond, 37 F.3d 418, 419 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 1163 (1995); United States v. Rayner, 2 F.3d 286, 288 (8th Cir.1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Scott Baker
See United States v. Richmond, 37 F.3d 418, 420 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 1163 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1119 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Furnish v. United States
The enhancement for possession of a firearm is appropriate "if the weapon was present, unless it is clearly improbable that the weapon was connected with the offense." U.S.S.G. 2D1.1(b)(1), application note 3; see also United States v. Tauil-Hernandez, 88 F.3d 576, 580 (8th Cir.1996) ("The crucial inquiry is whether `it is not clearly improbable that the weapon had a nexus with the criminal activity'") (citing United States v. Richmond, 37 F.3d 418, 419 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1178 , 115 S.Ct. 1163 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1119 (1995)), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1121 , 117 S.Ct. 1258 , 137 L.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paul W. DOUGLASS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Carrillo-Morales, 27 F.3d 1054, 1061-62 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1163 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1119 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Paul W. DOUGLASS v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION
See, e.g., United States v. Carrillo-Morales, 27 F.3d 1054, 1061-62 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1163 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1119 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Simmons
v.
Iowa
v.
Iowa
No. 94-7584.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1995.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.