green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.2 score
“e have consistently held in title vii cases that proof that the plaintiff was replaced by a person outside the protected class is not required”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Young v. Warner-Jenkinson Co.
e have consistently held in title vii cases that proof that the plaintiff was replaced by a person outside the protected class is not required
discussed
Cited "see"
Edwards v. WINCO Mfg. Co., Inc.
See Rinehart v. City of Independence, Mo., 35 F.3d 1263 , 1266 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1096 , 115 S.Ct. 1822 , 131 L.Ed.2d 744 (1995); Williams v. Ford Motor Co., 14 F.3d 1305, 1308 (8th Cir.1994); Walker v. St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Board of Trustees of Knox County Hospital v. Shalala
See United States v. Hauert, 40 F.3d 197, 199-200 (7th Cir.1994) (holding that evidence of defendant’s statements and conduct at an audit was admissible in a tax evasion trial because it was offered to prove defendant's knowledge and intent regarding the obligation to pay taxes), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1095 , 115 S.Ct. 1822 , 131 L.Ed.2d 744 (1995); Breuer Elec.
discussed
Cited "see"
C.H. Ex Rel. Z.H. v. Oliva
See Washegesic v. Bloomingdale Public Schools, 33 F.3d 679 (6th Cir.1994) (finding public school’s display of portrait of Jesus violated Lemon test and Establishment Clause), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1095 , 115 S.Ct. 1822 , 131 L.Ed.2d 744 ; see also Roberts v. Madigan, 921 F.2d 1047 (10th Cir.1990) (holding school’s removal of Bible and other religiously oriented books from library and the school’s forbidding teacher from reading Bible silently during class hours did not violate Establishment Clause or free speech rights of teacher), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1218 , 112 S.Ct. 3025 , 120 L.Ed…
discussed
Cited "see"
Braziel v. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc.
Instead, “the fact that a replacement is substantially younger than the plaintiff is a far more reliable indicator of age discrimination than is the fact that the plaintiff was replaced by someone outside the protected class.” Id.; accord, Rinehart v. City of Independence, Mo., 35 F.3d 1263, 1269 (8th Cir.1994) (in dicta, the Court opined that a plaintiff may establish the fourth element of his prima facie case by showing that he was replaced by a person sufficiently younger to permit an inference of age discrimination), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1822 , 131 L.Ed.2d 744 (1995). 2)…
discussed
Cited "see"
Dion R. Mcpherson v. Michigan High School Athletic Association, Inc.
See Washegesic v. Bloomingdale Public Schools, 33 F.3d 679, 681-83 (6th Cir.1994) (Merritt, C.J.) (noting that a plaintiff's interest in a law suit ceases when the challenged rule can no longer harm the plaintiff), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1822 , 131 L.Ed.2d 744 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
McPherson v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'n
See Washegesic v. Bloomingdale Public Schools, 33 F.3d 679, 681-83 (6th Cir.1994) (Merritt, C.J.) (noting that a plaintiffs interest in a law suit ceases when the challenged rule can no longer harm the plaintiff), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1822 , 131 L.Ed.2d 744 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Crist Ellis and Norma Wong-Larkin v. United Airlines, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus Curiae. Crist Ellis and Norma Wong-Larkin v. United Airlines, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
See Rinehart v. City of Independence, Mo., 35 F.3d 1263 , 1266 & n. 2 (8th Cir.1994) (noting majority position), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1822 , 131 L.Ed.2d 744 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Ellis v. United Airlines, Inc.
See Rinehart v. City of Independence, Mo., 35 F.3d 1263 , 1266 & n. 2 (8th Cir.1994) (noting majority position), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1822 , 131 L.Ed.2d 744 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bradford v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
See Rinehart v. City of Independence, Mo., 35 F.3d 1263 , 1265 n. 1 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1822 , 131 L.Ed.2d 744 (1995); Finley v. Empiregas, Inc., 975 F.2d 467 , 473 (8th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bradford v. Norfolk Southern Corp.
See Rinehart v. City of Independence, Mo., 35 F.3d 1263 , 1265 n. 1 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 1822 , 131 L.Ed.2d 744 (1995); Finley v. Empiregas, Inc., 975 F.2d 467 , 473 (8th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Neill
Cheek does not, however, prevent the jury from assessing the reasonableness of the defendant’s belief as one factor in assessing the honesty of his beliefs, id. at 203-04 , 111 S.Ct. at 611-12 ; see, e.g., United States v. Grunewald, 987 F.2d 531, 536 (8th Cir.1993), and it “does not mandate the use of the word ‘subjective’ or words ‘subjective standard.’ ” United States v. Hauert, 40 F.3d 197, 202 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1095 , 115 S.Ct. 1822 , 131 L.Ed.2d 744 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dietrich v. Canadian Pacific Ltd.
See, e.g., Rinehart v. City of Independence, 35 F.3d 1263, 1266-67 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1822 , 131 L.Ed.2d 744 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hartnagel
v.
General Motors Corp.
v.
General Motors Corp.
No. 94-1484.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 1, 1995.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Missouri (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.