In re Spychala, 515 U.S. 1141 (1995). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Spychala, 515 U.S. 1141 (1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McKown v. United States (caed, 2012-11-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" McKown v. United States
E.D. Cal. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Clouser v. Espy, 42 F.3d 1522, 1535-36 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1141 , 115 S.Ct. 2577 , 132 L.Ed.2d 827 (1995); Public Lands for the People, Inc. v. United States Dept. of Agriculture, 2010 WL 5200944 , at *7-8 (E.D.Cal.2010).
discussed Cited "see" Siskiyou Regional Education Project v. Rose (2×)
D. Or. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Clouser v. Espy, 42 F.3d 1522, 1525 (9th Cir.1994), cert, denied, 515 U.S. 1141 , 115 S.Ct. 2577 , 132 L.Ed.2d 827 (1995); United States v. Bagwell, 961 F.2d 1450 , 153-1454 (9th Cir.1992) (citations omitted).
cited Cited "see" Epstein v. McA, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Epstein, 515 U.S. 1141 , 115 S.Ct. 2576 , 132 L.Ed.2d 826 (1995); see also Matsushita, Pet. for Cert., at i ("1.
discussed Cited "see" Gossmeyer v. Mcdonald
7th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Maltby v. Winston, 36 F.3d 548, 554 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1141 , 115 S.Ct. 2576 , 132 L.Ed.2d 827 (1995). 62 It was certainly not clearly established at the time of the search that the search was unlawful.
cited Cited "see" Gossmeyer v. McDonald
7th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Maltby v. Winston, 36 F.3d 548, 554 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1141 , 115 S.Ct. 2576 , 132 L.Ed.2d 827 (1995).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Boyce v. Woodruff
N.D. Ind. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
Having found a material issue of fact as to the issue of probable cause as noted supra, a denial of summary judgement on the issue of qualified immunity results as well: “[w]here the only issue bearing on immunity is whether the defendant had probable cause to make the search or arrest that is challenged, merits and immunity merge; the dispositive question is simply whether the defendant did have probable cause.” Boyce v. Fernandes, 77 F.3d 946, 948 (7th Cir.1996); see also Maxwell, 998 F.2d at 435-36 (suggesting issues of qualified immunity and merits merge when probable cause is involved…
In re Spychala
No. 94-8945.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 19, 1995.
515 U.S. 1141
Published

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.