Eason v. North Carolina, 513 U.S. 1096 (1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Eason v. North Carolina, 513 U.S. 1096 (1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
185 citation events (84 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Williams v. Walker (ncctapp, 2007-08-21) · Strongest negative: Malicoat v. State (oklacrimapp, 2000-01-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
examined Cited "but see" Malicoat v. State (4×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 2000 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Revilla v. State, 1994 OK CR 24 , 877 P.2d 1143, 1150 , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1096 , 115 S.Ct. 764 , 130 L.Ed.2d 661 (1995) (any error invited where qualified emergency room doctor, on re-cross examination, gave opinion child's injuries were "non-accidental trauma"). [14] Fairchild v. State, 1999 OK CR 49 , 70 OBJ 3659, 3662, 992 P.2d 350, 357-358 . 1999 WL 1138585 .
examined Cited "see" Williams v. Walker (3×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Eason, 336 N.C. 730, 745 , 445 S.E.2d 917, 926 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1096 , 115 S.Ct. 764 , 130 L.Ed.2d 661 (1995) (providing that the trial court's findings of fact "are conclusive on appeal if supported by competent evidence, even if the evidence is conflicting." (citation omitted)); State v. Howell, 343 N.C. 229, 239 , 470 S.E.2d 38, 43 (1996) ("Conclusions of law that are correct in light of the findings are also binding on appeal.") Accordingly, the trial court order should be affirmed.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Blackstock
N.C. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Eason, 336 N.C. 730, 745 , 445 S.E.2d 917, 926 (1994) (conflicting evidence must be resolved by the trial court’s findings and such findings will not be disturbed on appeal where supported by competent evidence), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1096 , 130 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Lesane
N.C. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally State v. Eason, 336 N.C. 730, 746-47 , 445 S.E.2d 917, 927 (1994) (allowing a witness’ comment that defendant “was enjoying what he was doing” as a permissible “shorthand statement of fact”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1096 , 130 L.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Gary O'Dell
8th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Severe, 29 F.3d 444, 447 (8th Cir.1994) (“ ‘[W]here the evidence of an act and the evidence of a crime charged are inextricably intertwined, the act is not extrinsic and Rule *834 404(b) is not implicated.’ ”) (quoting United States v. DeLuna, 763 F.2d 897, 913 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 980 , 106 S.Ct. 382 , 88 L.Ed.2d 336 (1985)), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1096 , 115 S.Ct. 763 , 130 L.Ed.2d 660 (1995).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Antonio Zamarripa
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Severe, 29 F.3d 444, 448 (8th Cir. 1994) (affirming defendant&s sentence where he acknowledged charge to which he had pleaded guilty had minimum penalty of ten years imprisonment), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1096 (1995); United States v. Durham, 963 F.2d 185, 187 (8th Cir.) (defendant who explicitly and voluntarily exposes himself to specific sentence in plea agreement may not challenge that punishment on appeal), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1023 (1992); see also United States v. Karam, 37 F.3d 1280, 1284 (8th Cir. 1994) (noting 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(1)(B)&s mandatory ten-year sente…
examined Cited "see, e.g." State v. Gobal (3×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Eason, 336 N.C. 730, 747 , 445 S.E.2d 917, 927 (1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1096 , 130 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Eric B. Reinholz Margaret E. Chevalier
8th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id.; see also United States v. Severe, 29 F.3d 444, 446 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1096 , 115 S.Ct. 763 , 130 L.Ed.2d 660 (1995).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Eric Reinholz
8th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id.; see also United States v. Severe, 29 F.3d 444, 446 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1096 (1995).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bryan v. State (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 1997 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Revilla v. State, 877 P.2d 1143 (Okl.Cr.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 764 , 130 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994), and Robedeaux v. State, 866 P.2d 417 (Okl.Cr.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 833 , 115 S.Ct. 110 , 130 L.Ed.2d 57 (1994), in which we held other crimes evidence probative to motive should be admitted without engaging in any analysis of probative value versus prejudicial effect. [49] Sattayarak, 887 P.2d at 1331 ; Turner v. State, 629 P.2d 1263 (Okl.Cr.1981). [50] Blakely, 841 P.2d at 1159 . [51] 20 O.S.1991, § 3001.1; Hammon v. State, 898 P.2d 1287, 1302 (Okl.Cr.1995). [52] The…
Eason
v.
North Carolina
No. 94-6903.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1995.
513 U.S. 1096
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied.