green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ragan v. Commissioner
See In re ContiCommodity Servs., Inc., 733 F.Supp. 1555 (N.D.Ill.1990), aff'd in part sub nom, ContiCommodity Servs., Inc., v. Ragan, 63 F.3d 438 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1104 , 116 S.Ct. 1318 , 134 L.Ed.2d 471 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers v. Corbett
See, e.g., McLaughlin v. North Carolina Bd. of Elections, 65 F.3d 1215 , 1221 (4th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1104 , 116 S.Ct. 1320 , 134 L.Ed.2d 472 (1996); Rainbow Coalition v. Oklahoma State Election Bd., 844 F.2d 740 , 741-42 (10th Cir.1988). 29 In addition, the lapse of time between reaching the 2% threshold in the previous election and having to obtain petition signers for the next election does not result in an unacceptably close measurement of the same indicia of support as was the case with the two-tier system in Maryland. 9 A minor political party could have polled well in th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers v. Corbett
See, e.g., McLaughlin v. North Carolina Bd. of Elections, 65 F.3d 1215 , 1221 (4th Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, 517 U.S. 1104 , 116 S.Ct. 1320 , 134 L.Ed.2d 472 (1996); Rainbow Coalition v. Oklahoma State Election Bd., 844 F.2d 740 , 741-42 (10th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers v. Corbett
See, e.g., McLaughlin v. North Carolina Bd. of Elections, 65 F.3d 1215 , 1221 (4th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1104 , 116 S.Ct. 1320 , 134 L.Ed.2d 472 (1996); Rainbow Coalition v. Oklahoma State Election Bd., 844 F.2d 740 , 741-42 (10th Cir.1988). 30 In addition, the lapse of time between reaching the 2% threshold in the previous election and having to obtain petition signers for the next election does not result in an unacceptably close measurement of the same indicia of support as was the case with the two-tier system in Maryland. 10 A minor political party could have polled well in t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers v. Corbett
See, e.g., McLaughlin v. North Carolina Bd. of Elections, 65 F.3d 1215 , 1221 (4th Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, 517 U.S. 1104 , 116 S.Ct. 1320 , 134 L.Ed.2d 472 (1996); Rainbow Coalition v. Oklahoma State Election Bd., 844 F.2d 740 , 741-42 (10th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fred C. v. Texas Health and Human Services Com'n
Additionally, the Fifth Circuit has determined that state Medicaid decisions as to coverage “must have a rational basis for the distinctions they draw.” Curtis v. Taylor, 625 F.2d 645, 650 (5th Cir.1980); see also Hope Medical Group v. Edwards, 63 F.3d 418 , 427 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1104 , 116 S.Ct. 1319 , 134 L.Ed.2d 471 (1996)(rejecting attempt by state Medicaid agency to deny benefits when denial based on policy reasons which contradict purpose of Medicaid Act).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jin Ku Kim, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Nash Finch Company, Appellee/cross-Appellant
See, e.g., Evans v. Kansas City, Missouri, School District, 65 F.3d 98, 101 (8th Cir.1995) (§ 1981 retaliation claim), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1104 , 116 S.Ct. 1319 , 134 L.Ed.2d 472 (1996); Kobrin v. University of Minnesota, 34 F.3d 698, 704 (8th Cir.1994) (Title VII retaliation claim) (Kobrin ).
Ragan
v.
ContiCommodity Services, Inc. and Ragan v. ContiCommodity Services, Inc.
v.
ContiCommodity Services, Inc. and Ragan v. ContiCommodity Services, Inc.
No. 95-1147; No. 95-1151.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 25, 1996.
517 U.S. 1104
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 63 F. 3d 438.