green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.5 score
“standing alone, fact that prosecutor used 10 to 12 challenges to exclude persons from jury was insufficient to establish a batson violation”
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Hill
standing alone, fact that prosecutor used 10 to 12 challenges to exclude persons from jury was insufficient to establish a batson violation
cited
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Beard
See Wilson v. Pennsylvania, 516 U.S. 850 , 116 S.Ct. 145 , 138 L.Ed.2d 91 (1995).
examined
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Wilson
(4×)
See Wilson v. Pennsylvania, 516 U.S. 850 , 116 S.Ct. 145 , 133 L.Ed.2d 91 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coleman v. State
See Williamson v. Dugger, 651 So.2d 84, 88 (Fla.1994) (affirming summary denial of post-conviction motion, including claim of newly discovered evidence, which constituted cumulative impeachment evidence), cert. denied, *831 516 U.S. 850 , 116 S.Ct. 146 , 133 L.Ed.2d 91 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Haye v. State
See Williamson v. Dugger, 651 So.2d 84, 86-7 (Fla.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 850 , 116 S.Ct. 146 , 133 L.Ed.2d 91 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vanderblomen v. State
See Williamson v. Dugger, 651 So.2d 84 (Fla.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 850 , 116 S.Ct. 146 , 133 L.Ed.2d 91 (1995). [4] We note that the Court in Hopping v. State, 708 So.2d 263, 264 (Fla.1998), also recently held that "where it can be determined without an evidentiary hearing that a sentence has been unconstitutionally enhanced in violation of the double jeopardy clause, the sentence is illegal" and therefore can be remedied at any time by motion filed pursuant rule 3.800(a). [5] We note that the Court in Davis appeared to take a different view than that expressed in Mancino when it held t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Douglas
(2×)
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Wilson, 538 Pa. 485 , 649 A.2d 435, 448 (1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 850 , 116 S.Ct. 145 , 133 L.Ed.2d 91 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Williams
(2×)
In addition, “an appellate court may not interfere with the denial or granting of a new trial where the sole ground is the alleged recantation of state witnesses unless there has been a clear abuse of discretion.” Id. at 549 , 659 A.2d at 545 (quoting Commonwealth v. Coleman, 438 Pa. 373, 377 , 264 A.2d 649, 651 (1970)); see also 42 Pa.C.S. § 9543(a)(2)(vi) (providing for post-conviction relief where a conviction is the result of “[t]he unavailability at the time of trial of exculpatory evidence that has subsequently become available and would have changed the outcome of the trial if it…
Henderson
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 94-9683.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
Published
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.