green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Bradley v. United States
See Mark v. Borough of Hatboro, 51 F.3d 1137, 1141 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 858 , 116 S.Ct. 165 , 133 L.Ed.2d 107 (1995) (quoting Moore v. Tartler, 986 F.2d 682, 685 (3d Cir.1993)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hansell v. City of Atlantic City
See Mark v. Borough of Hatboro, 51 F.3d 1137, 1150-52 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 858 , 116 S.Ct. 165 , 133 L.Ed.2d 107 (1995)("[A]cts of officers in the ambit of personal pursuits are plainly excluded.”) (citation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morse v. Lower Merion School District
See Mark v. Borough of Hatboro, 51 F.3d 1137 , 1139 n. 1 (3d Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 858 , 116 S.Ct. 165 , 133 L.Ed.2d 107 (1995); Neely v. Zimmerman, 858 F.2d 144, 149 (3d Cir.1988) 2 The complaint also raised various state law claims against Jamison, Buttonwood and U.S. Roofing.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anspach v. City of Philadelphia, Department of Public Health
DISCUSSION To state a cause of action under § 1983, Plaintiffs must allege the deprivation of a constitutional right under color of state law. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ; Gomez v. Toledo, 446 U.S. 635, 640 , 100 S.Ct. 1920 , 64 L.Ed.2d 572 (1980); see also Mark v. Borough of Hatboro, 51 F.3d 1137, 1141 (3d Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 858 , 116 S.Ct. 165 , 133 L.Ed.2d 107 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anspach v. Phila Dept Pub
DISCUSSION To state a cause of action under § 1983, Plaintiffs must allege the deprivation of a constitutional right under color of state law. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ; Gomez v. Toledo, 446 U.S. 635, 640 (1980); see also Mark v. Borough of Hatboro, 51 F.3d 1137, 1141 (3d Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 858 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cole v. State
See also Hooker v. State, 1994 OK CR 75 , ¶ 44, 887 P.2d 1351, 1364-65 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 858 , 116 S.Ct. 164 , 133 L.Ed.2d 106 (1995); Revilla v. State, 1994 OK CR 24, ¶ 42 , 877 P.2d 1143, 1154-55 , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1096 , 115 S.Ct. 764 , 130 L.Ed.2d 661 (1995); Berget v. State, 1991 OK CR 121, ¶¶ 29-34 , 824 P.2d 364, 372-74 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 841 , 113 S.Ct. 124 , 121 L.Ed.2d 79 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rojem v. State
See also Hooker v. State, 1994 OK CR 75 , ¶ 44, 887 P.2d 1351, 1364-65 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 858 , 116 S.Ct. 164 , 133 L.Ed.2d 106 (1995); Revilla v. State, 1994 OK CR 24, ¶ 42 , 877 P.2d 1143, 1154-55, cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1096 , 115 S.Ct. 764 , 130 L.Ed.2d 661 (1995); Berget v. State, 1991 OK CR 121, ¶¶ 29-34 , 824 P.2d 364, 372-74 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 841 , 113 S.Ct. 124 , 121 L.Ed.2d 79 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thacker v. State
See also Hooker v. State, 1994 OK CR 75 , ¶ 44, 887 P.2d 1351, 1364-65, cert. denied, 516 U.S. 858 , 116 S.Ct. 164 , 133 L.Ed.2d 106 (1995); Revilla v. State, 1994 OK CR 24, ¶ 42 , 877 P.2d 1143, 1154-55, cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1096 , 115 S.Ct. 764 , 130 L.Ed.2d 661 (1995); Berget v. State, 1991 OK CR 121, ¶¶ 29-34 , 824 P.2d 364, 372-74 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 841 , 113 S.Ct. 124 , 121 L.Ed.2d 79 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lockett v. State
(2×)
See also Hooker v. State, 1994 OK CR 75 , ¶ 44, 887 P.2d 1351, 1364-65 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 858 , 116 S.Ct. 164 , 133 L.Ed.2d 106 (1995); Revilla v. State, 1994 OK CR 24, ¶ 42 , 877 P.2d 1143, 1154-55 , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1096 , 115 S.Ct. 764 , 130 L.Ed.2d 661 (1995); Berget v. State, 1991 OK CR 121, ¶¶ 29-34 , 824 P.2d 364, 372-74 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 841 , 113 S.Ct. 124 , 121 L.Ed.2d 79 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thornburg v. State
(2×)
See also Hooker v. State, 1994 OKCR 75, ¶ 32, 887 P.2d 1351, 1361 , cert. denied, 516 U.S. 858 , 116 S.Ct. 164 , 133 L.Ed.2d 106 (1995) (“Instructions on self-defense and voluntary intoxication were not warranted since Hooker’s defense was not that he acted in self-defense or was so intoxicated as to be [un]able to form the requisite intent but rather that he did not commit the crimes at all, or at least that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was the murderer.”). ¶ 14 Appellant acknowledges this Court’s holdings in Perry and Hooker and suggests that his case…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McKibben
v.
Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
v.
Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
No. 94-9818.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.