green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Marcum, Unpublished Decision (1-14-2002)
See State v. White (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 91 , certiorari denied in White v. Ohio , 516 U.S. 892 , 116 S.Ct. 242 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Frederick White v. James Schotten, Warden
(2×)
See White v. Ohio, 516 U.S. 892 , 116 S.Ct. 242 , 133 L.Ed.2d 168 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
White v. Schotten
See White v. Ohio, 516 U.S. 892 (1995). courts have allowed delays well after the 90-day deadline and also argues that Rule 26(B) does not provide any clear White then filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the guidelines for determining when a petitioner can file his United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, petition beyond the 90-day filing period. raising the following claims: A review of the Ohio court of appeals cases attached to (1) violation of petitioner’s rights to due process and a Petitioner’s brief reveals that the state courts have not fair trial a…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Linda P. Whitehead
See United States v. Heath, 58 F.3d 1271, 1275 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 892 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Hogancamp
See United States v. Heath, 58 F.3d 1271, 1275 (8th Cir.) (district court’s determination of credibility of witness is virtually unreviewable on appeal), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 892 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wesley Ira Purkey
See United States v. Kilgore, 58 F.3d 350, 353 (8th Cir. 1995); see also United States v. Heath, 58 F.3d 1271, 1275 (8th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 892 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wesley Ira Purkey
See United States v. Kilgore, 58 F.3d 350, 353 (8th Cir.1995); see also United States v. Heath, 58 F.3d 1271, 1275 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 892 , 116 S.Ct. 240 , 133 L.Ed.2d 167 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Culp v. United States
See also Giraldo v. United States, 54 F.3d 776 (6th Cir.) (unpublished) ("It is well settled that a § 2255 motion may not be employed to relitigate an issue that was raised and considered on appeal absent highly exceptional circumstances, such as an intervening change in the law.”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 892 , 116 S.Ct. 240 , 133 L.Ed.2d 167 (1995). 4 .
Martinez-Martinez
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 95-5381.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.