Hofmann v. Iowa, 518 U.S. 1007 (1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Hofmann v. Iowa, 518 U.S. 1007 (1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
72 citation events (43 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Long (mass, 2020-09-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Long
Mass. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Botero-Ospina, 71 F.3d 783, 790 (10th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1007 (1996) (Seymour, C.J., dissenting) ("Given the multitude of applicable traffic and equipment regulations in any jurisdiction . . . upholding a stop on the basis of a regulation seldom enforced opens the door to the arbitrary exercise of police discretion condemned in Terry and its progeny"). 14 We also previously have recognized, and limited, the discretion law enforcement officers may exercise in the context of exit orders during motor vehicle stops.
cited Cited "see" Mata v. City of Farmington
D.N.M. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Botero-Ospina, 71 F.3d 783, 787-88 (10th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1007 , 116 S.Ct. 2529 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1996).
cited Cited "see" Jonas v. BOARD OF COMM'RS OF LUNA COUNTY
D.N.M. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Botero-Ospina, 71 F.3d 783, 787-88 (10th Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, 518 U.S. 1007 , 116 S.Ct. 2529 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1996).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Jeter
D. Utah · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Botero-Ospina, 71 F.3d 783, 786 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1007 , 116 S.Ct. 2529 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1996). 38 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Herrell
10th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Botero-Ospina, 71 F.3d 783, 787 (10th Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, 518 U.S. 1007 , 116 S.Ct. 2529 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1996) (other subjective motives for stopping vehicle are irrelevant to inquiry of whether officer had reasonable suspicion that a traffic violation has occurred or is occurring).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Adkins
10th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See id., United States v. Botero-Ospina, 71 F.3d 783, 787 (10th Cir.1995) (en banc), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1007 , 116 S.Ct. 2529 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1996).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Magallanes
10th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Botero-Ospina, 71 F.3d 783, 785 (10th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1007 (1996).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Barnes
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Botero-Ospina, 71 F.3d 783, 787 (10th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1007 (1996).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Jeffrey Lynn Barnes, (w.d.okla.)
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Botero-Ospina, 71 F.3d 783, 787 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1007 , 116 S.Ct. 2529 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1996).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Burch, Gerald
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Botero-Ospina, 71 F.3d 783, 785 (10th Cir. 1995) (en banc), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1007 (1996).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Gerald G. Burch
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Botero-Ospina, 71 F.3d 783, 785 (10th Cir.1995) (en banc), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1007 , 116 S.Ct. 2529 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1996).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Denny Ray Hunnicutt
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Botero-Ospina, 71 F.3d 783, 785 (10th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1007, 116 S.Ct. 2529 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1996).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Government of the Virgin Islands v. Yarwood
virginislands · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
The Court reasoned that the statute merely guaranteed the rights of those specifically named, but did not work to preclude others from testifying “when appropriate.” Figgins, 858 S.W.2d at 855-56 ; see also, Sharp v. State, 908 S.W.2d 752 , 756, cert. denied 518 U.S. 1007 , 116 S. Ct. 2529 (1995).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." McGaughey v. State (2×)
Okla. Crim. App. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
In United States v. Sharpe , the Supreme Court used the term "investigative stops of vehicles" to describe what are typically called "traffic stops." 470 U.S. at 682 , 105 S.Ct. 1568 . [19] Prouse, 440 U.S. at 663 , 99 S.Ct. 1391 . [20] Sharpe, 470 U.S. at 682 , 105 S.Ct. 1568 (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 20 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 ). [21] Whren, 517 U.S. at 810 , 116 S.Ct. 1769 ; see also United States v. Botero-Ospina, 71 F.3d 783, 787 , (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1007 , 116 S.Ct. 2529 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1996) (en banc) ("[A] traffic stop is valid under the Fourth Amendment if the stop …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Griggs
M.D. Penn. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Johnson, 63 F.3d 242, 245 (3d Cir.1995) (applying Terry standard to motor vehicle stop), cert. de nied, 518 U.S. 1007 , 116 S.Ct. 2528 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1996); Commonwealth v. Andersen, 753 A.2d 1289, 1292-1293 (Pa.Super.Ct.2000) (under Pennsylvania law, “reasonable and articulable” standard applies to stop of a motor vehicle).
Hofmann
v.
Iowa
No. 95-7323.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1996.
518 U.S. 1007
Published

Sup. Ct. Iowa. Certiorari denied.