green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Duncan v. State
See Lowery v. State, 640 N.E.2d 1031, 1037 (Ind.1994), ce rt. denied, 516 U.S. 992 , 116 S.Ct. 525 , 133 L.Ed.2d 432 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allen v. State
See Benefiel v. State, 716 N.E.2d 906, 911 (Ind.1999), ce rt. denied, 531 U.S. 830 , 121 S.Ct. 83 , 148 L.Ed.2d 45 (2000), Lowery v. State, 640 N.E.2d 1031, 1037 (Ind.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 992 , 116 S.Ct. 525 , 133 L.Ed.2d 432 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Estate of Horton
See City of Fort Worth v. Adams, 888 S.W.2d 607, 613-14 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1994, writ denied), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 992 , 116 S.Ct. 525 , 133 L.Ed.2d 432 (1995); Tarrant County Water Control and Improvement District No. 1 v. Crossland, 781 S.W.2d 427, 432 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1989, writ denied), overruled on other grounds, City of Dallas v. Mitchell, 870 S.W.2d 21, 23 (Tex.1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Atherton v. State
See Lowery v. State, 640 N.E.2d 1031, 1037 (Ind.1994), cer t. denied 516 U.S. 992 , 116 S.Ct. 525 , 133 L.Ed.2d 432 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rowe v. State
See Lowery v. State, 640 N.E.2d 1031, 1036 (Ind.1994) (post-conviction remedy not substitute for appeal), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 992 , 116 S.Ct. 525 , 133 L.Ed.2d 432 (1995); Weatherford v. State, 619 N.E.2d 915, 916 (Ind.1993) (post-conviction procedures do not provide ‘super appeal’). *1108 To the extent that a person seeking post-conviction relief (usually referred to as the ‘petitioner’) has been denied relief by the post-conviction court, the petitioner appeals from a negative judgment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. State
See Lowery v. State, 640 N.E.2d 1031, 1036 (Ind.1994) (post-eonvietion remedy not substitute for appeal), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 992 , 116 S.Ct. 525 , 133 L.Ed.2d 432 (1995); Weatherford v. State, 619 N.E.2d 915, 916 (Ind.1993) (post-conviction procedures do not provide “super appeal”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Minnick v. State
(2×)
Ind.Post-Conviction Rule 1(1); see Lowery v. State, 640 N.E.2d 1031, 1036 (Ind.1994) (the post-conviction remedy is not a substitute for an appeal), cert. denied 516 U.S. 992 , 116 S.Ct. 525 , 133 L.Ed.2d 432 (1995); Weatherford v. State, 619 N.E.2d 915, 916 (Ind.1993) (post-conviction procedures do not provide a “super appeal”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bivins v. State
See, e.g., Lowery v. State, 640 N.E.2d 1031, 1041 (Ind.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 992 , 116 S.Ct. 525 , 133 L.Ed.2d 432 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gray
(2×)
See also Davis v. Scott , 51 F.3d 457, 462 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 516 U.S. 992 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sada v. State
See, e.g., Lowery v. State, 640 N.E.2d 1031, 1036 (Ind.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 992, 116 S.Ct. 525 , 133 L.Ed.2d 432 (1995) (standard of review for claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is identical to the standard for trial counsel).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wisehart v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., Lowery, 640 N.E.2d at 1048 (“standard of review for a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is identical to the standard for trial counsel”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 992 , 116 S.Ct. 525 , 133 L.Ed.2d 432 (1995).
Perkins
v.
LeCureux, Warden
v.
LeCureux, Warden
No. 95-6050.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 27, 1995.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.