green
Positive treatment
8.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Dickson
But see United States v. Davis, 103 F.3d 660 , 670 (8th Cir.1996) (concluding that in-court identification procedure, although suggestive, is "not so impermissibly suggestive as to lead to a likelihood of irreparable misidentification"), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1258 , 117 S.Ct. 2424 , 138 L.Ed.2d 187 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cleophus Davis, Jr.
See United States v. Davis, 103 F.3d 660 (8th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1258 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cleophus Davis, Jr.
See United States v. Davis, 103 F.3d 660 (8th Cir.1996), ce rt. denied, 520 U.S. 1258 , 117 S.Ct. 2424 , 138 L.Ed.2d 187 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter Simonelli
See United States v. Rose, 104 F.3d 1408, 1414 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1258 , 117 S.Ct. 2424 , 138 L.Ed.2d 187 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gallo
See United States v. Murray, 52 M.J. 423, 425-26 (2000) (citing United States v. Carroll, 105 F.3d 740, 742 (1st Cir.1997), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1258 , 117 S.Ct. 2424 , 138 L.Ed.2d 187 (1997); ACLU v. Reno, 929 F.Supp. 824 , 830- 38 (E.D.Pa.1996)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Murray
See United States v. Carroll, 105 F.3d 740, 742 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 520 U.S. 1258 , 117 S.Ct. 2424 , 138 L.Ed.2d 187 (1997)(finding that transmission of graphics files over the Internet satisfied' the interstate commerce element in a prosecution under 18 USC § 2251 (a)); American Civil Liberties Union v. Reno, 929 F.Supp. 824, 830-38 (E.D.Pa.l996)(findings of fact on the global nature and size of the Internet).
cited
Cited "see"
Michael S. Menzer v. United States
See United States v. Hicks, 106 F.3d 187, 189-90 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1258 , 117 S.Ct. 2425 , 138 L.Ed.2d 188 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patterson v. State
See United States v. Rose, 104 F.3d 1408, 1417 (1st Cir.) (holding there was no abuse of discretion by the trial judge in ruling that the failure to examine an ammunition clip found on defendant’s person did not justify a missing evidence instruction), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1258 , 117 S.Ct. 2424 , 138 L.Ed.2d 187 (1997); Doe v. Johnson, 52 F.3d 1448 , 1460 (7th Cir.1995) (noting, under Illinois law, that “whether to use the missing witness/evidence instruction is within the sound discretion of the trial court.”); Higgins v. Martin Marietta Corp., 752 F.2d 492, 496 (10th Cir.1985) (“Th…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Serrano Osorio
See United States v. Carroll, *15 105 F.3d 740, 742 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1258 , 117 S.Ct. 2424 , 138 L.Ed.2d 187 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
ca1 1999
See United States v. Carroll, 105 F.3d 740, 742 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1258 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lara
See United States v. Carroll, 105 F.3d 740, 742 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1258 , 117 S.Ct. 2424 , 138 L.Ed.2d 187 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Quantis Hawkins
See United States v. Davis, 103 F.3d 660, 670 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1258 , 117 S.Ct. 2424 , 138 L.Ed.2d 187 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Green v. State
See United States v. McDonald, 100 F.3d 1320 (7th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 2423 (1997); United States v. Gault, 92 F.3d 990 (10th Cir. 1996); United States v. Guzman, 75 F.3d 1090 (6th Cir. 1996); United States v. Harvey, 961 F.2d 1361 (8th Cir. 1992); United States v. Lovell, 849 F.2d 910 (5th Cir. 1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Warren
See United States v. McDonald, 100 F.3d 1320, 1325-26 , (7th Cir.1996.) cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 2423 (1997) (traveler does not enjoy "a reasonable expectation of privacy that the exterior of her luggage would not be felt, handled, or manipulated by others”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cyrus Cerro
See United States v. Littlefield, 105 F.3d 527, 528 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 2423 (1997) (per curiam) (recognizing that statute of limitations is a non-jurisdictional defense subject to waiver); see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 697 (1984) (ineffective assistance of counsel claims may be disposed of solely for lack of prejudice). 5 Cerro also contends that counsel was ineffective for failing to: (1) discuss the presentence report with him prior to sentencing; (2) object to a victim loss calculation in the presentence report; (3) challenge the court's restitution order…
examined
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Phillip SCHUMAN, Defendant-Appellant
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Littlefield, 105 F.3d 527, 529 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2423 , 138 L.Ed.2d 186 (1997) (Hall, J. concurring) (concluding defendant waived right to appeal sentence, in part because the prosecution objected to the advisement of appellate rights); see, e.g., United States v. Zink, 107 F.3d 716, 718 (9th Cir.1997) (citing with approval Hall, J. concurrence in Littlefield).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McGuire
See State v. Noel, 157 N.J. 141, 146-47 , 723 A. 2d 602 (1999); see also United States v. Davis, 103 F. 3d 660, 674 (8th Cir.1996) (cross-examination and presentation of contrary evidence are the appropriate means of attacking expert testimony that is otherwise admissible), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1258 , 117 S.Ct. 2424 , 138 L.Ed. 2d 187 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Kee
See, e.g., United States v. Rose, 104 F.3d 1408, 1417 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1258 (1997); Lunnon v. State, 710 A.2d 197, 199 (Del. 1998); Tyer v. United States, 912 A.2d 1150, 1164 (D.C. 2006); Estep v. Commonwealth, 64 S.W.3d 805, 809-810 (Ky. 2002); State v. Laurent, 144 N.H. 517, 522-523 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Haynes v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Davis, 103 F.3d 660, 673 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied 520 U.S. 1258 , 117 S.Ct. 2424 , 138 L.Ed.2d 187 (1997); State v. Noel, 157 N.J. 141 , 723 A.2d 602 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Concepcion v. United States
See also United States v. Mangone, 105 F.3d 29, 33 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1258 , 117 S.Ct. 2424 , 138 L.Ed.2d 187 (1997) (it is harmless error when the witness for the co-defendant implicated the defendant because the testimony was merely cumulative as to the conspiracy charge and did not contribute to the finding of guilt on the substantive fraud charges); United States *224 v. Kirsh, 54 F.3d 1062, 1069 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 516 U.S. 927 , 116 S.Ct. 330 , 133 L.Ed.2d 230 (1995) (it is harmless error when a co-defendant’s statements implicating defendant is elicited at the tria…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. P. Caballero-Chavez
Compare United States v. McDonald, 100 F.3d 1320, 1328 (7th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1258 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America v. Pablo Caballero-Chavez, - United States of America v. Jose Luis Meza-Lopez
(2×)
Compare United States v. McDonald, 100 F.3d 1320, 1328 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1258 , 117 S.Ct. 2423 , 138 L.Ed.2d 186 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose Luis Lozada-Rivera A/K/A Sealed 1
Compare Awon, 135 F.3d at 101 (utilizing, without discussion, harmless beyond a reasonable doubt test for erroneous application of Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(1)(B)) with United States v. Rose, 104 F.3d 1408, 1414 (1st Cir.) ("In the usual case, a non-constitutional evidentiary error will be treated as harmless if it is highly probable that the error did not contribute to the verdict.”), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1258 , 117 S.Ct. 2424 , 138 L.Ed.2d 187 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Angel A. Rojo
See United States v. Yee Soon Shin, 953 F.2d 559, 560 (9th Cir.1992); see also United States v. Littlefield, 105 F.3d 527, 528 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 2423 , 138 L.Ed.2d 186 (1997)
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sanchez
See, e.g., United States v. Littlefield, 105 F.3d 527, 528 (9th Cir.) (sentence within statutory maximum did not violate law for purposes of § 3742(a)), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 2423 (1997)..
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Edward Sanchez, A/K/A Antonio Edward Sanchez
See, e.g., United States v. Littlefield, 105 F.3d 527, 528 (9th Cir.) (sentence within statutory maximum did not violate law for purposes of § 3742(a)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2423 , 138 L.Ed.2d 186 (1997).
Bizberg-Gogol, aka Zion
v.
Federal Bureau of Investigation
v.
Federal Bureau of Investigation
No. 96-8810.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 1997.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.