green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Morris v. Beard
See Commonwealth v. Morris, 546 Pa. 296 , 684 A.2d 1037 (1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1106 , 117 S.Ct. 2484 , 138 L.Ed.2d 992 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rosen
See United States v. Fleschner, 98 F.3d 155, 159 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1106 , 117 S.Ct. 2484 , 138 L.Ed.2d 992 (1997). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Gibbs v. SLM Corp.
See generally Braman v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc., 94 F.3d 1260, 1264-66 (9th Cir.1996) (a major purpose of the HEA is to stabilize student loan program and cut government losses due to default), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1106 , 117 S.Ct. 2484 , 138 L.Ed.2d 992 (1997). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Schiff
See United States v. Fleschner, 98 F.3d 155, 158-59 (4th Cir. 1996) (defendants who instructed and advised meeting attendees to file unlawful tax returns were not entitled to First Amendment jury instruction because “[t]he defendants’ words and acts were not remote from the commission of the criminal acts.”), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1106 , 117 S.Ct. 2484 , 138 L.Ed.2d 992 (1997); Kelley, 769 F.2d at 217 (no First Amendment protection for telling listeners “what to do and how to prepare the [tax] forms” and supplying them with [tax] forms and materials, even though seminars were dedica…
discussed
Cited "see"
Skerry v. Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corp.
See Braman v. United Student Aid Funds, 94 F.3d 1260 , 1262 n. 3 (9th Cir.1996) cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1106 , 117 S.Ct. 2484 , 138 L.Ed.2d 992 (1997) and cert. denied 521 U.S. 1111 , 117 S.Ct. 2496 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1997) (discussing lender’s assignee’s default of the plaintiff and referencing default procedures set forth in FFELP regulations); Pelfrey, 71 F.Supp.2d at 1164 (discussing default and citing FFELP regulations); Jones v. Intuition, Inc., 12 F.Supp. 2d 775, 778 (W.D.Tenn.1998) (“default is defined as the failure to make an installment period [sic] under the loan terms which …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carson v. Lewis
“The police and prosecutors are not required to disclose all of their evidence in an application for an arrest warrant or at a felony hearing (see, e.g., CPL 120.20, 180.70; People v. Hodge, 53 N.Y.2d 313, 318-19 , 441 N.Y.S.2d 231 , 423 N.E.2d 1060 (1981)), and are not generally required to disclose all discrepancies or potential weaknesses in the case uncovered during the investigation.” Gisondi, 72 N.Y.2d at 285 , 532 N.Y.S.2d at 237 , 528 N.E.2d 157 ; see also United States v. Regan, 103 F.3d 1072, 1081 (2d Cir.) (finding Government had “no obligation to present exculpatory material …
Clarkson
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 96-7983.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 23, 1997.
521 U.S. 1106
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.