green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
15.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Town of Huntsville v. Duncan
article xi, section 8 is implicated when a statute 'contravene some general law which has mandatory statewide application.
discussed
Cited "see"
H.P. v. Z.G.
See Davis v. Tabachnick, 425 Mass. 1010, 1010 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 982 (1997); Pandey v. Roulston, 419 Mass. 1010, 1011 (1995) ("The fact that the plaintiff is pro se does not excuse him from compliance with relevant rules of substantive and procedural law"). 3 209A order.
discussed
Cited "see"
L.B.R. v. B.J.R.
See Davis v. Tabachnick, 425 Mass. 1010, 1010 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 982 (1997); Pandey v. Roulston, 419 Mass. 1010, 1011 (1995) ("The fact that the plaintiff is pro se does not excuse him from compliance with relevant rules of substantive and procedural law"). 3 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Anthony M. Valenti.
See Davis v. Tabachnick, 425 Mass. 1010 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 982 (1997); Pandey v. Roulston, 419 Mass. 1010 (1995) ("The fact that the plaintiff is pro se does not excuse him from compliance with relevant rules of substantive and procedural law"). 3 prevention order was in effect on the date of the alleged violation; (2) the defendant had knowledge of the order; and (3) the defendant violated the order.
discussed
Cited "see"
Peter M. Leo v. Norman E. Leo.
See Davis v. Tabachnick, 425 Mass. 1010 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 982 (1997); Pandey v. Roulston, 419 Mass. 1010, 1010 (1995) ("The fact that the plaintiff is pro se does not excuse him from compliance with relevant rules of substantive and procedural law"). 3 The defendant's request for attorney's fees and other damages is denied. 4 As to the defendant's other arguments, we have reviewed them all and determined that they do no merit further discussion.
cited
Cited "see"
Charles D. Clarke v. Donna M. Murphy.
See Davis v. Tabachnick, 425 Mass. 1010, 1010 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 982 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
DON PERRY v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF HULL & others.
(2×)
See Davis v. Tabachnick, 425 Mass. 1010, 1010 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 982 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re: Adoption of AMH, a minor Jerry L. Baker and wife, Louise K. Baker v. Shao-Qiang (Jack) He and wife, Qin (Casey) Luo
See Riggs v. Burson, 941 S.W.2d 44, 51 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 982 , 139 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Adoption of M.J.S.
(2×)
See Riggs v. Burson, 941 S.W.2d 44, 51 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 982 , 118 S.Ct. 444 , 139 L.Ed.2d 380 (1997); Vogel v. Wells Fargo Guard Servs., 937 S.W.2d 856, 858 (Tenn.1996).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re: Adoption of M.J.S.
See Riggs v. Burson, 941 S.W.2d 44, 51 (Tenn.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 982 (1997); Vogel v. Wells Fargo Guard Servs., 937 S.W.2d 856, 858 (Tenn. 1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Colelli
v.
Sandt, dba 1st Klas Marina
v.
Sandt, dba 1st Klas Marina
No. 97-489.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 17, 1997.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Tennessee (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.