green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Tactical Stop-Loss, LLC v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.
See United States v. Brumley, 116 F.3d 728, 741 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (Jolly, J., dissenting) (“Grammarians teach that the word ‘another,’ when used as a pronoun, is an indefinite pronoun which has no specific meaning in and of itself but draws its meaning from the context in which it is used.”), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1028 , 118 S.Ct. 625 , 139 L.Ed.2d 606 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Guillermo Lara-Aceves
See Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians v. United States, 110 F.3d 688, 693 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 625 , 139 L.Ed.2d 606 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. United States
See Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon v. United States, 110 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 625 , 139 L.Ed.2d 606 (1997); Pueblo of Santa Ana v. Kelly, 104 F.3d 1546 , 1548 n. 3 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 45 , 139 L.Ed.2d 11 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. United States
See Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon v. United States, 110 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 625 , 139 L.Ed.2d 606 (1997); Pueblo of Santa Ana v. Kelly, 104 F.3d 1546 , 1548 n. 3 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. --, 118 S.Ct. 45 , 139 L.Ed.2d 11 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rybicki
See, e.g., United States v. Brumley, 116 F.3d 728, 742-45 (5th Cir.) ( en banc ) (Jolly & DeMoss, JJ., dissenting), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1028 , 118 S.Ct. 625 , 139 L.Ed.2d 606 (1997); see also United States v. Frost, 125 F.3d 346, 364 (6th Cir.1997) (collecting authority for the proposition that the "[t]iming and the explicit terms of § 1346 make clear that Congress intended the provision to reinstate the doctrine of intangible rights to honest services"), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 810 , 119 S.Ct. 40 , 41, 142 L.Ed.2d 32 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rybicki
See, e.g., United States v. Brumley, 116 F.3d 728, 742-45 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (Jolly & DeMoss, JJ., dissenting), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1028 , 118 S.Ct. 625 , 139 L.Ed.2d 606 (1997); see also United States v. Frost, 125 F.3d 346, 364 (6th Cir.1997) (collecting authority for the proposition that the “[t]iming and the explicit terms of § 1346 make clear that Congress intended the provision to reinstate the doctrine of intangible rights to honest services”), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 810 , 119 S.Ct. 40 , 41, 142 L.Ed.2d 32 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cynthia Bennett Evans, Also Known as Cindy
Clay insisted, however, that when he "used to go in the gambling shack and shoot the dice," he would holler "oh, cold blooded," and everyone just started using that as his name 3 For example, she falsely indicated that she had visited Clay at his supposed place of employment, Mr. C's Car Wash, after that business had ceased operations 4 The statute provides, in pertinent part: Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud ... for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for mai…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brumley
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 97-486.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 15, 1997.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.