Angelini v. Illinois, 526 U.S. 1075 (1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Angelini v. Illinois, 526 U.S. 1075 (1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
61 citation events (51 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Mumma (nc, 2019-05-10)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Mumma (2×)
N.C. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Locklear , 349 N.C. 118 , 150-51, 505 S.E.2d 277 , 296 (1998) (in which the defendant failed to establish prejudicial error in his conviction for first-degree murder based on the trial court's allowing the jury to take the defendant's statement to police into the jury room without his consent), cert. denied , 526 U.S. 1075 , 119 S.Ct. 1475 , 143 L.Ed.2d 559 (1999) ; State v. Cunningham , 344 N.C. 341 , 364, 474 S.E.2d 772 , 783 (1996) (The defendant failed to establish prejudicial error in his conviction for first-degree murder based on the trial court's allowing the jury to take …
cited Cited "see" State v. Waring
N.C. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Locklear, 349 N.C. 118, 156 , 505 S.E.2d 277, 299 (1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1075 , 143 L.
discussed Cited "see" In re S.N.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Locklear, 349 N.C. 118 , 149, 505 S.E.2d 277 , 295 (1998) (the appellant "has the burden of showing error and that there was a reasonable possibility that a different result would have been reached at trial if such error had not occurred"), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1075 , 119 S.Ct. 1475 , 143 L.Ed.2d 559 (1999).
discussed Cited "see" In Re SN
N.C. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Locklear, 349 N.C. 118, 149 , 505 S.E.2d 277, 295 (1998) (the appellant "has the burden of showing error and that there was a reasonable possibility that a different result would have been reached at trial if such error had not occurred"), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1075 , 119 S.Ct. 1475 , 143 L.Ed.2d 559 (1999).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Forte (2×)
N.C. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Locklear, 349 N.C. 118, 156 , 505 S.E.2d 277, 299 (1998) (applying the plain error rule to questions asked on cross-examination that were not objected to at trial), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1075 , 143 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Lanier
N.C. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Locklear, 349 N.C. 118, 149 , 505 S.E.2d 277, 295 (1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1075 , 143 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Nicholson
N.C. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Locklear, 349 N.C. 118, 138 , 505 S.E.2d 277, 289 (1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1075 , 143 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Ward (2×)
N.C. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See N.C.G.S. § 15A-2000(f)(6) (1999). "[O]ur capital punishment statute provides that, during the sentencing phase, evidence may be presented `as to any matter that the court deems relevant to sentence,' including matters relating to mitigating circumstances." State v. Locklear, 349 N.C. 118, 158 , 505 S.E.2d 277, 300 (1998) (quoting N.C.G.S. § 15A-2000(a)(3) (1997)), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1075 , 119 S.Ct. 1475 , 143 L.Ed.2d 559 (1999).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Patterson (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Locklear, 349 N.C. 118, 153 , 505 S.E.2d 277, 297 (1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1075 , 119 S.Ct. 1475 , 143 L.Ed.2d 559 (1999); State v. Bishop, 346 N.C. 365, 396 , 488 S.E.2d 769, 786 (1997).
discussed Cited "see" Jerry Lee Staley v. Kurt Jones
6th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See DeLisle v. Rivers, 161 F.3d 370, 380 (6th Cir.1998) (en banc), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1075 , 119 S.Ct. 1476 , 143 L.Ed.2d 559 (1999) (summarily rejecting the argument that the sufficiency of the evidence and impartiality of the jury claims are not reviewable on habeas, stating that: “The United States Supreme Court has explained that Stone was a prudential decision, based in large part on the fact that the exclusionary rule is not a personal constitutional right, and it has repeatedly declined to extend the rule in Stone beyond its original bounds” (internal quotation marks omitted)).
cited Cited "see" James Doan v. Anthony J. Brigano
6th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See DeLisle v. Rivers, 161 F.3d 370, 380 (6th Cir.1998) (en banc), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1075 , 119 S.Ct. 1476 , 143 L.Ed.2d 559 (1999).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Rodriguez
N.C. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
On the other hand, "[t]he trial judge has broad discretion to regulate jury voir dire ." Fullwood , 343 N.C. at 732 , 472 S.E.2d at 887 (citing State v. Lee , 335 N.C. 244 , 268, 439 S.E.2d 547 , 559, cert. denied , 513 U.S. 891 , 115 S.Ct. 239 , 130 L.Ed. 2d 162 (1994) ); see also State v. Locklear , 349 N.C. 118 , 142, 505 S.E.2d 277 , 291 (1998) (explaining that "the extent and manner of the inquiry [allowed to counsel] rests within the trial court's discretion"), cert. denied , 526 U.S. 1075 , 119 S.Ct. 1475 , 143 L.Ed. 2d 559 (1999).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Carter
unknown court · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
The proper exercise of this authority will prevent the determination of this aggravating circumstance from becoming a “mini-trial” of the previous charge. *353 McDougall, 308 N.C. at 22 , 301 S.E.2d at 321 (citations omitted); see also State v. Locklear, 349 N.C. 118, 158 , 505 S.E.2d 277, 300 (1998) (trial court may exclude evidence during capital sentencing that is “repetitive, unreliable, or lacking an adequate foundation”), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1075 , 143 L.
Angelini
v.
Illinois
No. 98-8285.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 19, 1999.
526 U.S. 1075
Published

App. Ct. Ill., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.