green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaiser Group Holdings, Inc. v. Squire Sanders & Dempsey LLP (In Re Kaiser Group International, Inc.)
See In re Akl, 397 B.R. 546, 554 (Bankr.D.D.C.2008) (citing In re Southmark Corp., 163 F.3d 925, 931 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2339 , 144 L.Ed.2d 236 (1999)); see also, Seven Fields, 505 F.3d at 260-61 .
discussed
Cited "see"
SUTTON WOODWORKING MACH. CO., INC. v. Mereen-Johnson MacH. Co.
See Christo v. Padgett, 223 F.3d 1324, 1331 (11th Cir.2000)(observing that a majority of courts have concluded that an action filed in state court and later removed to federal court is commenced in state court for purposes of Section 1334(c)(2) and would remain capable of timely adjudication upon remand to state court)(eiting Southmark Corp. v. Coopers & Lybrand (In re Southmark Corp.), 163 F.3d 925, 929 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2339 , 144 L.Ed.2d 236 (1999); Robinson v. Mich. Consol.
cited
Cited "see"
Broyles v. U.S. Gypsum Co.
See In re Southmark Corp., 163 F.3d 925, 929 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2339 , 144 L.Ed.2d 236 (1999); Thomas, 259 B.R. at 575 .
cited
Cited "see"
Valdez v. Kreso, Inc.
See South-mark Corp. v. Coopers & Lybrand (In re South-mark Corp.), 163 F.3d 925, 934 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2339 , 144 L.Ed.2d 236 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Estate of Shannon Novack, Deceased, by Its Personal Representative, Susan Turbin, and Susan Turbin v. County of Wood, a Municipal Corporation
See Payne v. Churchich, 161 F.3d 1030, 1042 (7th Cir.1998), ce rt. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2339 , 144 L.Ed.2d 236 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Principal Life Insurance v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In Re Brook Mays Music Co.)
See also Southmark Corp. v. Coopers & Lybrand (In re Southmark Corp.), 163 F.3d 925, 930 (5th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2339 , 144 L.Ed.2d 236 (1999) (action based on state created rights, that, had there been no bankruptcy, could have proceeded in state court, was noncore). 4 .There is, of course, also a list of fifteen or so categories of "core” matters found at 28 U.S.C. § 157 (b)(2)(A)-(0), including broad "catch-all” categories such as “matters concerning the administration of the estate” and "other proceedings affecting the liquidation of the assets of …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mourad v. Farrell (In Re V&M Management, Inc.)
See, e.g., In re Southmark Corp., 163 F.3d 925, 931 (5th Cir.1999) (finding jurisdiction over accountant malpractice claims), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2339 , 144 L.Ed.2d 236 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Agent Systems, Inc. v. Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority (In Re Agent Systems, Inc.)
Harley Hotels, Inc. v. Rain’s International, Ltd., 57 B.R. 773, 780 (M.D.Pa.1985); see, also, In re Southmark Corp., 163 F.3d 925, 930 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2339 , 144 L.Ed.2d 236 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ellis Henderson v. Michael F. Sheahan and J.W. Fairman
(2×)
Instead, only a jail official's "deliberate indifference to a prisoner's serious illness or injury states a cause of action" under the Eighth Amendment. 2 Estelle, 429 U.S. 105 ; see also Payne for Hicks v. Churchich, 161 F.3d 1030, 1041 (7th Cir. 1998) ("A detainee establishes a sec. 1983 claim by demonstrating that the defendants were aware of a substantial risk of serious injury to the detainee but nevertheless failed to take appropriate steps to protect him from a known danger."), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 2339 (1999). 13 The Supreme Court has recently made clear that a viable Eighth Amendm…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SOUTHMARK CORPORATION
v.
COOPERS & LYBRAND, L. L. P.
v.
COOPERS & LYBRAND, L. L. P.
No. 98-1643.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 1999.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.