green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
U.S. EEOC v. W & O, Inc.
But see Hudson v. Reno, 130 F.3d 1193, 1203-04 (6th Cir. 1997) (treating front pay as compensatory damages for “future pecuniary losses” under § 1981a(b)(3) in part because the Sixth Circuit had historically “treated front pay, in most contexts, as a legal, rather than an equitable remedy”), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 822 , 119 S. Ct. 64 , 142 L.
discussed
Cited "but see"
U.S. EEOC v. W & O, Inc.
But see Hudson v. Reno, 130 F.3d 1193, 1203-04 (6th Cir.1997) (treating front pay as compensatory damages for "future pecuniary losses" under § 1981a(b)(3) in part because the Sixth Circuit had historically "treated front pay, in most contexts, as a legal, rather than an equitable remedy"), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 822 , 119 S.Ct. 64 , 142 L.Ed.2d 50 (1998).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. W&O, Inc.
But see Hudson v. Reno, 130 F.3d 1193, 1203-04 (6th Cir. 1997) (treating front pay as compensatory damages for “future pecuniary losses” under § 1981a(b)(3) in part because the Sixth Circuit had historically “treated front pay, in most contexts, as a legal, rather than an equitable remedy”), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 822 , 119 S.Ct. 64 , 142 L.Ed.2d 50 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Consolidated Brokers Insurance Services, Inc. v. Pan-American Assurance Co.
See ARW Exploration Corp. v. Aguirre, 45 F.3d 1455, 1462 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 822 , 119 S.Ct. 65 , 142 L.Ed.2d 51 (1998) (holding that a dispute arising out of an agreement that lacked an arbitration clause was still subject to arbitration based on the broad arbitration provision contained in other agreements relating to the same joint venture); National Am.
cited
Cited "see"
Louis P. Cardamone v. William H. Cohen
See Hudson v. Reno, 130 F.3d 1193, 1198 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 822 , 119 S.Ct. 64 , 142 L.Ed.2d 50 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Frank v. USA
See Hudson v. Reno, 130 2 F.3d 1193, 1204-05 (6th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 822 (1998); Brune v. Internal Revenue Service, 861 F.2d 1284, 1287-88 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rau v. Apple-Rio Management Co., Inc.
See Hudson v. Reno, 130 F.3d 1193, 1199-1201 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 822 , 119 S.Ct. 64 , 142 L.Ed.2d 50 (1998); Smith v. Chicago School Reform Board, 165 F.3d 1142, 1149-50 (7th Cir.1999); Baty v. Willamette Industries, Inc., 172 F.3d 1232, 1245-46 (10th Cir.1999); Krahel v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc., 971 F.Supp. 440, 455 (D.Or.1997); Hall v. Stormont Trice Corp., 976 F.Supp. 383, 385-86 (E.D.Va.1997); Martini v. Federal Nat’l Mortgage Assoc., 977 F.Supp. 464, 469-70 (D.D.C.1997), vac’d on other grounds, 178 F.3d 1336 (D.C.Cir.1999); Muller v. Costello, 997 F.Sup…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bechhoefer v. U.S. Department of Justice
See, e.g., Hudson v. Reno, 130 F.3d 1193, 1206 (6th Cir.1997) (“Plainly, Dedrick’s notes about Plaintiffs misconduct which were kept in a locked drawer and labeled the ‘First Assistant’s’ files do not fall within [the] definition” of “system of records,” since they were not retrievable under plaintiffs name), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 822 , 119 S.Ct. 64 , 142 L.Ed.2d 50 (1998); Smith v. Henderson, No. C-96-4665, 1999 WL 1029862 (N.D.Cal.1999) (hiring coordinator’s “never-never drawer,” which she de *99 scribed as a locked drawer containing a file folder in which she kept her…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
California Dental Ass'n v. Federal Trade Commission
(2×)
Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law ¶ 1914c, pp. 313-315 (1998); see also Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn., 134 F. 3d 1010, 1019 (CA10), cert. denied, 525 U. S. 822 (1998); United States v. Brown Univ., 5 F. 3d 658 , 669 (CA3 1993); Capital Imaging Associates v. Mohawk Valley Medical Associates, Inc., 996 F. 2d 537, 543 (CA2), cert. denied, 510 U. S. 947 (1993); Kreuzer v. American Academy of Periodontology, 735 F. 2d 1479, 1492-1495 (CADC 1984).
Weinstein
v.
Fidelity Brokerage Services, Inc.
v.
Fidelity Brokerage Services, Inc.
No. 97-1986.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1998.
Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.