discussed Cited "see" State v. Santiago See State v. Mitchell, 54 Conn. App. 361, 368 , 738 A.2d 188 (“American Bar Association’s [c]rimi-nal [j]ustice [m]entai [h]eaith [standards . . . advise defense counsel to move for an evaluation of the defendant’s competence to stand trial whenever he in good faith doubts his client’s competence”), cert. denied, 251 Conn. 910 , 739 A.2d 1250 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1171 , 120 S. Ct. 1197 , 145 L.

cited Cited "see" Thomas Ryan v. David H. Miller, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Facility See Quartararo v. Hanslmaier, 528 U.S. 1170 , 120 S.Ct. 1196 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1100 (2000).

cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Henry See also State v. Mitchell, 54 Conn. App. 361, 371-72 , 738 A.2d 188 , cert. denied, 251 Conn. 910 , 739 A.2d 1250 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1171 , 120 S. Ct. 1197 , 145 L.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bohan v. Kuhlmann To succeed the petitioner must demonstrate that “no rational trier of fact could have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 324 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); see also Quartararo v. Hanslmaier, 186 F.3d 91, 97 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1170 , 120 S.Ct. 1196 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1100 (2000); Knapp, 46 F.3d at 178 .