green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Ayala v. KC Environmental Health
(2×)
Co., 561 F.Supp. 656, 665-666 (N.D.Ill.1982), aff'd, 736 F.2d 388 (7th Cir.1984) (emphasis in original)); see Novato Fire Protection Dist. v. United States, 181 F.3d 1135, 1142, n. 6 (9th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 529 U.S. 1129 , 120 S.Ct. 2005 , 146 L.Ed.2d 955 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Snow v. BE & K Construction Co.
See Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, 194 F.3d 1070, 1071-72 (9th Cir.1999), cert granted, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 2004 , 146 L.Ed.2d 955 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Louis v. Geneva Enterprises, Inc.
See Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, 194 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir.1999), cert. granted, - U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 2004 , 146 L.Ed.2d 955 (U.S. May 22, 2000); Craft v. Campbell Soup Co., 177 F.3d 1083 (9th Cir.1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Chinyere Jenkins v. School Distric of KC
See United States v. City of Yonkers, 197 F.3d 41, 54-55 (2d Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, - U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 2005 , 146 L.Ed.2d 956 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sioux Biochemical, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc.
See, e.g., University of Colorado Found., Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co., 196 F.3d 1366 (Fed.Cir.1999) (state law claims of fraudulent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment by doctors who claimed to have invented a product based on the defendant’s failure to identify them as inventors in a patent application were not necessarily preempted by federal patent law), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1130 , 120 S.Ct. 2005 , 146 L.Ed.2d 956 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Terry Belk Dwayne Collins, on Behalf of Themselves and the Class They Represent, William Capacchione, Individually and on Behalf of Christina Capacchione, a Minor Michael P. Grant Richard Easterling Lawrence Gauvreau Karen Bentley Charles Thompson Scott C. Willard v. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Boardof Education Eric Smith, Superintendent, in His Official Capacity Arthur Griffin, Chairman of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School Board, in His Official Capacity, United States of America North Carolina School Boards Association National School Boards Association, Amici Curiae. William Capacchione, Individually and on Behalf of Christina Capacchione, a Minor Michael P. Grant Richard Easterling Lawrence Gauvreau Karen Bentley Charles Thompson Scott C. Willard, and Terry Belk Dwayne Collins, on Behalf of Themselves and the Class They Represent v. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Boardof Education Eric Smith, Superintendent, in His Official Capacity Arthur Griffin, Chairman of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School Board, in His Official Capacity, United States of America North Carolina School Boards Association National School Boards Association, Amici Curiae. William Capacchione, Individually and on Behalf of Christina Capacchione, a Minor Michael P. Grant Richard Easterling Lawrence Gauvreau Karen Bentley Charles Thompson Scott C. Willard,plaintiffs-Appellees, and Terry Belk Dwayne Collins, on Behalf of Themselves and the Class They Represent v. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Boardof Education Eric Smith, Superintendent, in His Official Capacity Arthur Griffin, Chairman of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School Board, in His Official Capacity, United States of America North Carolina School Boards Association National School Boards Association, Amici Curiae. William Capacchione, Individually and on Behalf of Christina Capacchione, a Minor Michael P. Grant Richard Easterling Lawrence Gauvreau Karen Bentley Charles Thompson Scott C. Willard, and Terry Belk Dwayne Collins, on Behalf of Themselves and the Class They Represent v. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Boardof Education Eric Smith, Superintendent, in His Official Capacity Arthur Griffin, Chairman of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School Board, in His Official Capacity, United States of America North Carolina School Boards Association National School Boards Association, Amici Curiae
See Baliles, 829 F.2d at 1313 (upholding lower court's findings that low achievement is "primarily attributable to the high incidence of poverty" in the school district); see also United States v. City of Yonkers, 197 F.3d 41, 54 (2d Cir. 1999) (observing that "using achievement test scores as a measure, either direct or indirect, of a school system's movement away from segregation is deeply problematic"), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 2005 (2000); People Who Care v. Rockford Bd. of Educ., 111 F.3d 528 , 537 (7th Cir. 1997) (explaining that a number of variables, other than discrimination, account …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Belk v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
(2×)
See Baliles, 829 F.2d at 1313 (upholding lower court’s findings that low achievement is "primarily attributable to the high incidence of poverty" in the school district); see also United States v. City of Yonkers, 197 F.3d 41, 54 (2d Cir. 1999) (observing that "using achievement test scores as a measure, either direct or indirect, of a school system’s movement away from segregation is deeply problematic"), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 2005 (2000); People Who Care v. Rockford Bd. of Educ., 111 F.3d 528 , 537 (7th Cir. 1997) (explaining that a number of variables, other than discrimination, acco…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Novato Fire Protection District
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 99-1209.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 22, 2000.
Cited by 13 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.