green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
10.8 score
“matsushita itself indicates that broad collateral review of the adequacy of representation ( or of the other due process requirements for binding absent class members ) is not available.”
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lamarque v. Fairbanks Capital Corp.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
matsushita itself indicates that broad collateral review of the adequacy of representation ( or of the other due process requirements for binding absent class members ) is not available.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Evergreen Trading, LLC v. United States
reliance upon remembered details from officials who lacked the ultimate authority to issue any proposed regulation has little support in the law
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hospitality Management Associates, Inc. v. Shell Oil Co.
epstein iii
discussed
Cited "see"
Aguirre v. Albertson's, Inc.
See Epstein v. MCA, Inc., 179 F3d 641, 648-49 (9th Cir), cert den, 528 US 1004 (1999) (collateral second-guessing of the adequacy of notice and representation in a prior class action is inappropriate). 13 Federal courts have an obligation to assess their jurisdiction independently of the litigants’ assertions.
discussed
Cited "see"
Nell Jean Industries, Inc. v. Barnhart
See Anker Energy v. Consolidation Coal, 177 F.3d 161, 172 (3d Cir.) (the fact that [plaintiff] Anker was a “related person” to a signatory to 1974 and later coal wage agreements “factually distinguishes Anker’s situation from that of Eastern Enterprises and compels a finding that the [Coal] Act is constitutional in this instance”), cer t. denied, 528 U.S. 1003 , 120 S.Ct. 496 , 145 L.Ed.2d 383 (1999); Unity Real Estate v. Hudson, 178 F.3d 649, 659 (3d Cir.) (“the very distinction that [plaintiff, Unity, was a related person to signatory to 1974 and later coal wage agreements] compe…
discussed
Cited "see"
Roth v. I & M Rail Link, L.L.C.
See Oglesby v. Delware & Hudson Ry., 180 F.3d 458, 461 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1004 , 120 S.Ct. 498 , 145 L.Ed.2d 384 (1999); Law v. General Motors Corp., 114 F.3d 908, 910-11 (9th Cir.1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Ellen Gayle Moore v. Liberty National Insurance Co
See Blackfeet Nat’l Bank v. Nelson, 171 F.3d 1237 , 1240 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1004 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Engvall v. Soo Line Railroad Co.
See Oglesby v. Del. & Hudson Ry., 180 F.3d 458 (2d Cir.) (action by injured railroad employee against railroad, under the FELA, and locomotive manufacturer), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1004 , 120 S.Ct. 498 , 145 L.Ed.2d 384 (1999); Springston v. Consol.
cited
Cited "see"
Bourgo v. Canby School District
See Wehrli v. County of Orange, 175 F.3d 692, 695 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1004 , 120 S.Ct. 498 , 145 L.Ed.2d 384 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit
See Hudson v. City of New Orleans, 174 F.3d 677, 684-85 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1004 , 120 S.Ct. 498 , 145 L.Ed.2d 385 (1999). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
At Massey Coal Co., Inc. v. Massanari
See also Anker Energy Corp. v. Consolidation Coal Co., 177 F.3d 161, 170 (3rd Cir.1999), (“in cases where the approaches differ, no particular standard is binding on an inferior court because none has received the support of a majority of the Supreme Court”), cert. denied sub nom., Anker Energy Corp. v. United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Fund, 528 U.S. 1003 , 120 S.Ct. 496 , 145 L.Ed.2d 383 (1999).
Nakamura
v.
Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior
v.
Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior
No. 99-265.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 15, 1999.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.