green
Positive treatment
Trending · 84 recent citers
Quoted verbatim 2×
15.1 score
“although 5 there is no evidence that the juvenile possessed an immediate ability to carry out the threat at the time he communicated the drawing to mrs. f, this does 'not mean that could not have carried out his threat at a later time”
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Fotios Efthimiadis.
although 5 there is no evidence that the juvenile possessed an immediate ability to carry out the threat at the time he communicated the drawing to mrs. f, this does 'not mean that could not have carried out his threat at a later time
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Marcos Gomez.
jury may consider the context in which the allegedly threatening statement was made and all of the surrounding circumstances
discussed
Cited "see"
COMMONWEALTH v. FAYAD F., a Juvenile
See Commonwealth v. Sholley, 432 Mass. 721, 728-731 (2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 980 (2001) (defendant committed disorderly conduct where, over course of two to three minutes, he ran through hallway of court house shouting threatening language, caused court officer to leave his primary duty to respond to noise and commotion, caused other court house employees and users alarm as they abandoned their duties or activities to see what was happening, and was pursued outside by police officers).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Arickson Cruz
See Commonwealth v. Sholley, 432 Mass. 721, 726 (2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 980 (2001), quoting Commonwealth v. Robicheau, 421 Mass. 176, 183 (1995) ("[T]he First Amendment does not protect conduct that threatens another").
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Cintron
See Commonwealth v. Accime, 476 Mass. 469, 472-473 (2017), quoting Commonwealth v. Sholley, 432 Mass. 721 , 727 n.7 (2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 980 (2001) ("the disorderly conduct provision in [G.
cited
Cited "see"
WOODS v. ROBINSON
See Werts v. Vaughn, 228 F.3d 178, 186 (3d Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 980 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
DANIELS v. NOGAN
See Werts v. Vaughn, 228 F.3d 178, 186 (3d Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 980 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Felix F., a juvenile v. Commonwealth
See Commonwealth v. Hamilton, 459 Mass. 422, 426-427 (2011), quoting Commonwealth v. Sholley, 432 Mass. 721, 725 (2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 980 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Banks v. Horn
See Werts v. Vaughn, 228 F.3d 178, 192 (3d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 980 , 121 S.Ct. 1621 , 149 L.Ed.2d 483 (2001). 102 In this case, because of the application of Pennsylvania's unique relaxed waiver doctrine in capital cases, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court not only had the first opportunity to review Banks' jury instructions, verdict slip, and jury poll in light of Mills, but exercised that opportunity.
discussed
Cited "see"
Banks v. Horn
(2×)
See Werts v. Vaughn, 228 F.3d 178, 192 (3d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 980 , 121 S.Ct. 1621 , 149 L.Ed.2d 483 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jay Wesley Neill v. Gary Gibson, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
See Jones, 527 U.S. at 381-82 , 119 S.Ct. 2090 . 26 For these same reasons, Neill's claims that his trial attorney was ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor's misstatement, and to object to the prosecutor's argument generally concerning the possibility of another retrial, lack merit. 3 See, e.g., Werts v. Vaughn, 228 F.3d 178, 205 (3d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 980 , 121 S.Ct. 1621 , 149 L.Ed.2d 483 (2001); see also Washington v. Hofbauer, 228 F.3d 689, 699 (6th Cir.2000) (noting that, before assessing whether defense counsel was ineffective for failing to object to prosec…
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Zine
See Commonwealth v. Sholley, 432 Mass. 721, 731-732 (2000), cert, denied, 532 U.S. 980 (2001).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Hokanson
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Sholley, 432 Mass. 721, 724-725 (2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 980 (2001).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Senior
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Sholley, 432 Mass. 721, 724-725 (2000), cert, denied, 532 U.S. 980 (2001), and cases cited (affirming conviction pursuant to G.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Disler
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Sholley, 432 Mass. 721, 724-725 (2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 980 (2001), and cases cited (affirming conviction pursuant to G.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Cahill
Compare Commonwealth v. Sholley, 432 Mass. 721, 728-729 (2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 980 (2001).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Leyo v. State
Hodges v. State, 904 P.2d 334, 339 (Wyo.1995) (citation omitted); see also Robinson v. State, 11 P.3d 361, 368 (Wyo.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 980 , 121 S.Ct. 1620 , 149 L.Ed.2d 483 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nolan v. Krajcik
Compare Commonwealth v. Sholley, 432 Mass. 721 , *462 729, 739 N.E.2d 236, 242-43 (2000) (defendant’s conduct deemed tumultuous where his screaming and running through the courthouse corridor “went far beyond the level of noise and commotion ordinarily encountered in court house hallways.”), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 980 , 121 S.Ct. 1621 , 149 L.Ed.2d 484 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McLaughlin v. Carroll
Matteo v. Superintendent, SCI Albion, 171 F.3d 877, 880 (3d Cir.1999)(en banc); see also Werts v. Vaughn, 228 F.3d 178 (3d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 980 , 121 S.Ct. 1621 , 149 L.Ed.2d 483 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Trimboli
Compare Commonwealth v. Sholley, 432 Mass. 721, 731-732 (2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 980 (2001), where the record was silent as to what impact, if any, a disturbance in the corridor (not in the courtroom) had on any court proceedings.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Gittens
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Sholley, 432 Mass. 721, 725 (2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 980 (2001) (jury permitted to conclude that fathers’ rights advocate “threatened to commit a crime” pursuant to G.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Willis v. State
Hodges v. State, 904 P.2d 334, 339 (Wyo.1995) (citation omitted); see also Robinson v. State, 11 P.3d 361, 368 (Wyo.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 980 , 121 S.Ct. 1620 , 149 L.Ed.2d 483 (2001).
Coltin
v.
Town of Londonderry, New Hampshire
v.
Town of Londonderry, New Hampshire
No. 00-8573.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 16, 2001.
Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Appeals Court (2)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.