green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.4 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rice v. Moore
errors in the application of state law, especially rulings regarding the admission or exclusion of evidence, are usually not to be questioned in a federal habeas corpus proceeding.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kumal Burton v. Paul Renico, Warden
errors in the application of state law, especially rulings regarding the admission or exclusion of evidence, are usually not to be questioned in a federal habeas corpus proceeding.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Burton v. Renico
errors in the application of state law, especially rulings regarding the admission or exclusion of evidence, are usually not to be questioned in a federal habeas corpus proceeding.
cited
Cited "see"
Kinley v. Bradshaw
See Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 551-52 (6th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Brinkley v. Houk
See Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 554 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , 149 L.Ed.2d 502 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Willie Jones v. Shirlee Harry
See Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 561 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , 149 L.Ed.2d 502 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nelloms v. Jackson
See Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 561 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , 149 L.Ed.2d 502 (2001) (indicating that an appellate court should not consider habeas claims not raised before the district court).
cited
Cited "see"
Wampler v. Mills
See Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 549 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , 149 L.Ed.2d 502 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Roe
See Heller v. Doe, 509 U.S. 312 , 113 S.Ct. 2637 , 125 L.Ed.2d 257 (1993); accord United States v. Hancock, 231 F.3d 557, 565 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1641 , 149 L.Ed.2d 500 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Ferqueron v. Straub
See Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 561 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , 149 L.Ed.2d 502 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
King v. Trippett
See Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 549 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , 149 L.Ed.2d 502 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Milheron
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Hancock, 231 F.3d 557, 564 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1641 , 149 L.Ed.2d 500 (2001) (recognizing that possession of a gun is “an active and potentially dangerous act”) (quoting United States v. Indelicato, 800 F.2d 1482, 1484 (9th Cir.1986)); Hutzell, 217 F.3d at 969 (noting that possession of a gun is “a highly regulated activity, and everyone knows it”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ovalle v. United States
See, e.g., Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 561 (6th Cir.2000), cert, denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , 149 L.Ed.2d 502 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pfeifer
See Hutzell, 217 F.3d at 967-69; see also United States v. Hancock, 231 F.3d 557, 561-65 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1641 , 149 L.Ed.2d 500 (2001); Mitchell, 209 F.3d at 322-24 ; United States v. Beavers, 206 F.3d 706, 708-10 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1121 , 120 S.Ct. 1989 , 146 L.Ed.2d 815 (2000); Boyd, 52 F.Supp.2d at 1237 ; United States v. Hicks, 992 F.Supp. 1244, 1246 (D.Kan.1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Foster v. Ludwick
“Generally, state-court evidentiary rulings cannot rise to the level of due process violations unless they ‘offend[ ] some principle of justice so rooted in the traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental.’ Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996)(quoting Patterson v. New York, 432 U.S. 197, 202 , 97 S.Ct. 2319 , 53 L.Ed.2d 281 (1977)); see also Spencer v. Texas, 385 U.S. 554, 563-64 , 87 S.Ct. 648 , 17 L.Ed.2d 606 (1967).” Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 552 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David v. Lavinge
Therefore, “[hjabeas review does not encompass state court rulings on the admission of evidence unless there is a constitutional violation.” Clemmons v. Sowders, 34 F.3d 352, 357 (6th Cir.1994); see also Seymour v. Walker, 224 F.3d 542, 552 (6th Cir.2000) (explaining that errors in the application of state law, especially rulings on the admission or exclusion of evidence, usually are not questioned in a federal habeas corpus proceeding unless the errors violate a fundamental principle of justice) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 989 , 121 S.Ct. 1643 , 149 L.Ed.2d 502 (2001).
Gomez-Infante
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 00-9016.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 16, 2001.
532 U.S. 989
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (2) · S.D. Ohio (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.