green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.2 score
“malicious injury involves (1) a wrongful act, (2) done 27 intentionally, (3) which necessarily causes injury, and (4) is done without just cause or excuse”
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ng v. Tom
malicious injury involves (1) a wrongful act, (2) done 27 intentionally, (3) which necessarily causes injury, and (4) is done without just cause or excuse
discussed
Cited "see"
deBenedictis v. Dougherty (In re Dougherty)
See Petralia v. Jercich (In re Jercich), 238 F.3d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 930 , 121 S.Ct. 2552 , 150 L.Ed.2d 718 (2001)(to be excepted from discharge “a breach of contract must be accompanied by some form of ‘tortious conduct’ that gives rise to ‘willful and malicious injury.’ ”).
cited
Cited "see"
Heer v. Scott (In Re Scott)
See Petralia v. Jercich (In re Jercich), 238 F.3d 1202, 1207 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 930 , 121 S.Ct. 2552 , 150 L.Ed.2d 718 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maltbia v. Big Blue Healthcare, Inc.
“If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c); see also Lazorko v. Pa. Hosp., 237 F.3d 242, 250 (3d Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 930 (2001) (“When the underlying federal subject matter jurisdiction upon which to remove a case from state court does not exist, the entire case must be remanded.” (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c))); RMP Consulting Grp., Inc. v. Datronic Rental Corp., No. 98-5062, 189 F.3d 478 , 1999 WL 617690 , at *3–4 (10th Cir. Aug. 16, 1999) (unpublished …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goldblatt v. HCP Prairie Village KS OPCO LLC
“If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c); see also Lazorko v. Pa. Hosp., 237 F.3d 242, 250 (3d Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 930 (2001) (“When the underlying federal subject matter jurisdiction upon which to remove a case from state court does not exist, the entire case must be remanded.” (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c))); RMP Consulting Grp., Inc. v. Datronic Rental Corp., No. 98-5062, 189 F.3d 478 , 1999 WL 617690 , at *3–4 (10th Cir. Aug. 16, 1999) (discussing �…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anson v. HCP Prairie Village KS OPCO LLC
“If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c); see also Lazorko v. Pa. Hosp., 237 F.3d 242, 250 (3d Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 930 (2001) (“When the underlying federal subject matter jurisdiction upon which to remove a case from state court does not exist, the entire case must be remanded.” (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c))); RMP Consulting Grp., Inc. v. Darue Eng’g & Mfg., 545 U.S. 308 (2005)); Doc. 57 at 1 (same); Doc. 59 at 1 (same), the court rejects the argument …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grohmann v. HCP Prairie Village KS OPCO LLC
“If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c); see also Lazorko v. Pa. Hosp., 237 F.3d 242, 250 (3d Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 930 (2001) (“When the underlying federal subject matter jurisdiction upon which to remove a case from state court does not exist, the entire case must be remanded.” (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c))); RMP Consulting Grp., Inc. v. Datronic Rental Corp., No. 98-5062, 189 F.3d 478 , 1999 WL 617690 , at *3–4 (10th Cir. Aug. 16, 1999) (discussing �…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Heartland By-Products, Inc. v. United States
See, e.g., Lazorko v. Pa. Hosp., 237 F.3d 242 (3d Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 930 , 121 S.Ct. 2552 , 150 L.Ed.2d 719 (2001) (courts relinquish jurisdiction when dismissing all claims before them).
Jercich
v.
Petralia
v.
Petralia
No. 00-1632.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 25, 2001.
533 U.S. 930
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: N.D. California (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.