cited Cited "see" Stewart v. Morgan See Mackey v. Dutton, 217 F.3d 399, 413 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1087 , 121 S.Ct. 804 , 148 L.Ed.2d 690 (2001); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (e)(1).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Newton See also Williams v. Bordenkircher, 696 F.2d 464, 467 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 916 (1983).4 A defendant is incompetent to stand trial when he does not have 3 As the majority notes, only evidence seized from those two properties was used at trial. 4 Although Pate and Williams are state habeas cases, as are later published cases reaffirming their standard of review, see, e.g., Mackey v. Dutton, 217 F.3d 399, 413-14 (6th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1087 (2001), it stands to reason that our standard of review on direct appeal from a district court would certainly be no more defere…