Jones v. Catoe, 531 U.S. 1091 (2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Jones v. Catoe, 531 U.S. 1091 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“efendant's failure to object at trial and properly preserve the constitutional issue for appeal requires us to review this potential constitutional error under the plain error standard of review”
16 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Sullivan (ncctapp, 2016-12-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Sullivan
N.C. Ct. App. · 2016 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
efendant's failure to object at trial and properly preserve the constitutional issue for appeal requires us to review this potential constitutional error under the plain error standard of review
discussed Cited "see" State v. Wiley
N.C. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lemons, 352 N.C. 87, 92 , 530 S.E.2d 542, 545 (2000) (for constitutional issue addressed pursuant to Court’s discretionary authority under Rule 2 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, the defendant’s failure to object at trial and to raise a constitutional issue required consideration of his argument under plain error standard of review), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1091 , 148 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jones
v.
Catoe, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections
No. 00-6918.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 2001.
531 U.S. 1091
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 69%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of North Caro… (1)

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.