Soto-Herrera v. United States, 531 U.S. 1099 (2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Soto-Herrera v. United States, 531 U.S. 1099 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ryder v. State (oklacrimapp, 2004-01-14)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Ryder v. State
Okla. Crim. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bland v. State, 4 P.3d 702, 727 (Okl.Cr.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1099 , 121 S.Ct. 832 , 148 L.Ed.2d 714 (2001) (Appellant must show not only that error occurred but that the resulting prejudice from the error was such that reversal is* warranted); Bernay v. State, 989 P.2d 998, 1007 (Okl.Cr.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 834 , 121 S.Ct. 92 , 148 L.Ed.2d 52 (2000) .(an appellant must support his allegations of error by both argument and citation of authority).
discussed Cited "see" Jackson v. Gibson
10th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bland v. State, 4 P.3d 702, 715 (Okla.Crim.App.2000), cert, denied, 531 U.S. 1099 , 121 S.Ct. 832 , 148 L.Ed.2d 714 (2001); Fitzgerald v. State, 972 P.2d 1157, 1174 (Okla.Crim.App.1998); Lamb v. State, 767 P.2d 887, 889-90 (Okla.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Freedman v. America Online, Inc.
D. Conn. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Hambrick, 55 F.Supp.2d 504 (W.D.Va. 1999), aff'd 225 F.3d 656 (4th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1099 , 121 S.Ct. 832 , 148 L.Ed.2d 714 (2001); United States v. Kennedy, 81 F.Supp.2d 1103 (D.Kan.2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. McElroy (2×)
Haw. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
The cross-examination of matters which were addressed in direct-examination is not objectionable, even if the answers affect a witness' credibility and character." State v. Taylor, 333 S.C. 159 , 508 S.E.2d 870, 878 (1998) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also Bobb v. United States, 758 A.2d 958, 963 (D.C.2000) ("When a defendant testifies to certain facts or issues during his direct examination, he `opens the door' to further inquiry into those matters on cross-examination." (Brackets and citations omitted.)), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1099 , 121 S.Ct. 832 , 148 L.Ed.2d 713 …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lockett v. State
Okla. Crim. App. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Bland v. State, 2000 OK CR 11, ¶ 19 , 4 P.3d 702, 712 , cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1099 , 121 S.Ct. 832 , 148 L.Ed.2d 714 (2001); Perry v. State, 1995 OK CR 20, ¶ 25 , 893 P.2d 521, 527-28 . ¶ 10 Appellant also complains that the portions of the voir dire conducted outside his presence violated 22 O.S.1991, § 583 which requires that a defendant be personally present at his trial if the prosecution is for a felony.
Soto-Herrera
v.
United States
No. 00-7194.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 2001.
531 U.S. 1099
Published

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.