Wilson v. Georgia, 535 U.S. 1017 (2002). · Go Syfert
Wilson v. Georgia, 535 U.S. 1017 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“whether a contract term is ambiguous is a question of law for the court to determine.”
78 citation events (78 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Roofers Local 149 Joint Apprenticeship Fund v. Bloom Roofing Systems (ca6, 2005-05-31) · Strongest negative: Pierre v. JC PENNEY CO., INC. (nyed, 2004-11-03)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "but see" Pierre v. JC PENNEY CO., INC. (2×)
E.D.N.Y · 2004 · signal: but see · confidence high
See Phillip v. University of Rochester, 316 F.3d 291, 292 (2d Cir. 2003); Chapman v. Higbee Co., 319 F.3d 825 (6th Cir.2003), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 2902 , 159 L.Ed.2d 827 (2004) (en banc decision following Phillip rule and vacating its earlier decision requiring state action); but see Youngblood v. Hy-Vee Food Stores, Inc., 266 F.3d 851 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1017 , 122 S.Ct. 1606 , 152 L.Ed.2d 621 (2002) (requiring state action for purposes of equal benefit clause); Brown v. Philip Morris Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 799 (3d Cir. 2001) (same).
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Roofers Local 149 Joint Apprenticeship Fund v. Bloom Roofing Systems
6th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
whether a contract term is ambiguous is a question of law for the court to determine.
discussed Cited "see" Johnson v. Macy
C.D. Cal. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Walker v. City of Lakewood, 272 F.3d 1114 , 1131 n. 8 (9th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1017 , 122 S.Ct. 1607 , 152 L.Ed.2d 621 (2002); see also Broadmoor San Clemente Homeowners’ Assn. v. Nelson, 25 Cal.App.4th 1, 5-7 , 30 Cal.Rptr.2d 316 (Cal.App.1994) ("it clearly, was the intent of the Legislature, in adopting the 1993 amendments [to FEHA], to conform California law on the subject of fair housing to the Federal Fair Housing Act.”). .
discussed Cited "see" Northwestern Ohio Administrators, Inc. v. Walcher & Fox, Inc. (2×)
N.D. Ohio · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Northwestern Ohio Administrators, Inc. v. Walcher & Fox, Inc., 270 F.3d 1018 (6th Cir.2001), cert. denied sub nom., Walcher & Fox, Inc. v. International Ass’n of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental Iron Workers, Local Union Number 55, 535 U.S. 1017 , 122 S.Ct. 1606 , 152 L.Ed.2d 620 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Shawn Pratt v. Charles Greiner
2d Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smaldone v. Senkowski, 273 F.3d 133, 136 (2d Cir.2001) (holding that whether the period during which a petitioner may pursue certiorari on state collateral motions tolls AEDPA’s statute of limitations is a question of law to be reviewed de novo), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1606 , 152 L.Ed.2d 621 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Rafael Rodriguez v. Floyd Bennett, Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility
2d Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Smaldone v. Senkowski, 273 F.3d 133, 138 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1606 , 152 L.Ed.2d 621 (2002); Smith v. McGinnis, 208 F.3d 13, 17-18 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 840 , 121 S.Ct. 104 , 148 L.Ed.2d 63 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Resnik v. Swartz
2d Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smaldone v. Senkowski, 273 F.3d 133, 137 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 122 S.Ct. 1606 , 152 L.Ed.2d 621 (2002) (stating the principle that, when particular language is included in one section of a statute but omitted from another, it is generally presumed that the omission is intentional); West Coast Truck Lines, Inc. v. Arcata Cmty. Recycling Ctr., 846 F.2d 1239, 1244 (9th Cir.1988) (same); see also Black & Decker Corp. v. Commissioner, 986 F.2d 60, 65 (4th Cir.1993) (applying a rule of statutory construction to interpret an administrative regulation); 1A Norman J.
discussed Cited "see" Resnik v. Swartz
2d Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smaldone v. Senkowski, 273 F.3d 133, 137 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 1606 , 152 L.Ed.2d 621 (2002) (stating the principle that, when particular language is included in one section of a statute but omitted from another, it is generally presumed that the omission is intentional); West Coast Truck Lines, Inc. v. Arcata Cmty. Recycling Ctr., 846 F.2d 1239, 1244 (9th Cir.1988) (same); see also Black & Decker Corp. v. Commissioner, 986 F.2d 60, 65 (4th Cir.1993) (applying a rule of statutory construction to interpret an administrative regulation); 1A Norman J.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bishop v. TOYS\ R\" US-NY LLC" (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Instead, the relationship is based on a single discrete transaction — the purchase of goods.” Arguello, 330 F.3d at 360 (footnote omitted); see also, e.g., Youngblood v. Hy-Vee Food Stores, Inc., 266 F.3d 851, 854 (8th Cir.2001) (“While there is scant precedent, courts that have addressed the issue have concluded that once the purchase is completed, no contractual relationship remains.”) (citations omitted), cert, denied, 535 U.S. 1017 , 122 S.Ct. 1606 , 152 L.Ed.2d 621 (2002); Garrett v. Tandy Corp., 295 F.3d 94 , 101 (1st Cir.2002) (dismissing section 1981 claim where “the appellan…
Wilson
v.
Georgia
01-1192.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 22, 2002.
535 U.S. 1017

535 U.S. 1017

WILSON
v.
GEORGIA.

No. 01-1192.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 22, 2002.

1

Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 249 Ga. App. 560, 549 S. E. 2d 418.