Ayala-Ayala v. United States, 537 U.S. 1208 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Ayala-Ayala v. United States, 537 U.S. 1208 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “Because Congress expressly provided .that courts may impose punishment for a violation of § 924(c) in addition to the punishment imposed for the predicate felony, Defendant’s double jeopardy arguments lack merit.”
43 citation events (43 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Morrow (dcd, 2015-04-30)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Morrow (2×)
D.D.C. · 2015 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
because congress expressly provided .that courts may impose punishment for a violation of 924(c) in addition to the punishment imposed for the predicate felony, defendant's double jeopardy arguments lack merit.
discussed Cited "see" Joseph v. Coyle
6th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Davis, 306 F.3d 398, 421 (6th Cir. 2002) (holding that there was no prejudice from a delayed disclosure where the “[d]efendant was given every opportunity to review the [newly disclosed] tapes and to recall [the witness] if necessary, but he refused to do so”), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1208 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Richard Joseph, Petitioner-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ralph Coyle, Warden, Respondent-Appellee/cross-Appellant (2×)
6th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Davis, 306 F.3d 398, 421 (6th Cir.2002) (holding that there was no prejudice from a delayed disclosure where the “[d]efendant was given every opportunity to review the [newly disclosed] tapes and to recall [the witness] if necessary, but he refused to do so”), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1208 , 123 S.Ct. 1290 , 154 L.Ed.2d 1054 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Rodriguez (2×)
7th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
Express, Inc., 490 U.S. 477, 484 , 109 S.Ct. 1917 , 104 L.Ed.2d 526 (1989) (circuit courts should follow controlling precedent, leaving the Supreme Court to decide whether to overturn its decision); see United States v. Bock, 312 F.3d 829, 831 (7th Cir.2002) (noting that this court is not in a position to overrule Almendarez-Torres), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1208 , 123 S.Ct. 1289 , 154 L.Ed.2d 1053 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Dusenbery (2×)
6th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Davis, 306 F.3d 398, 411 (6th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1208 , 123 S.Ct. 1290 , 154 L.Ed.2d 1054 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Lovitt v. Warden, Sussex I State Prison
Va. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Collier v. Davis, 301 F.3d 843, 849 (7th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1208 (2003); Knox v. Johnson, 224 F.3d 470, 482 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 975 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Sorrell (2×)
6th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Davis, 306 F.3d 398, 418 (6th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1208 , 123 S.Ct. 1290 , 154 L.Ed.2d 1054 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Holmes
6th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
It is well established in this circuit that an individual “can be convicted of using or carrying a firearm [under an earlier version of § 924(c)], even though he never personally used or carried any weapon during the period charged in the indictment.” Wright v. United States, 182 F.3d 458, 464 (6th Cir. 1999); Rattigan v. United States, 151 F.3d 551, 557 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1031 (1998); United States v. Lowery, 60 F.3d 1199, 1202 (6th Cir. 1995); see also United States v. Davis, 306 F.3d 398, 412 (6th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1208 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. William L. Harris (03-6207) Tarvis Holmes (03-6255) (2×)
6th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
It is well established in this circuit that an individual “can be convicted of using or carrying a firearm [under an earlier version of § 924(c) ], even though he never personally used or carried any weapon during the period charged in the indictment.” Wright v. United States, 182 F.3d 458, 464 (6th Cir.1999); Rattigan v. United States, 151 F.3d 551, 557 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1031 , 119 S.Ct. 570 , 142 L.Ed.2d 475 (1998); United States v. Lowery, 60 F.3d 1199, 1202 (6th Cir.1995); see also United States v. Davis, 306 F.3d 398, 412 (6th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1208 ,…
Ayala-Ayala
v.
United States
02-8133.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 2003.
537 U.S. 1208
Cited by 13 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 60%
Citer courts: District of Columbia (2)

537 U.S. 1208

AYALA-AYALA
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 02-8133.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 24, 2003.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 46 Fed. Appx. 489.