Dix v. United States, 536 U.S. 978 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Dix v. United States, 536 U.S. 978 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (36 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Estate of Sedley Alley v. State of Tennessee
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Estate of Sedley Alley v. State of Tennessee
unknown court · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kutzner v. Johnson, 303 F.3d 333, 338 (5th Cir.) (noting that motions for DNA testing are a collateral attack on the conviction and are subject to the prohibition of successive habeas petitions), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 978 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Zollo v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kutzner v. Cockrell, 303 F.3d 333 (5th Cr.), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 978 , 123 S. Ct. 14 , 153 L.
discussed Cited "see" In Re: Williams v.
4th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
Rodriguez v. Superintendent, 139 F.3d 270, 274 (1st Cir. 1998); see Kutzner v. Cockrell, 303 F.3d 333, 336 (5th Cir.) (rejecting PFA motion on ground that factual predicate for claim was discoverable before prisoner filed first habeas application), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 978 (2002); McDonald v. Bowersox, 125 F.3d 1183, 1186 (8th Cir. 1997) (per curiam) (same).
discussed Cited "see" In Re: Billy Williams, Movant
4th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
Rodriguez v. Superintendent, 139 F.3d 270, 274 (1st Cir.1998); see Kutzner v. Cockrell, 303 F.3d 333, 336 (5th Cir.) (rejecting PFA motion on ground that factual predicate for claim was discoverable before prisoner filed first habeas application), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 978 , 123 S.Ct. 14 , 153 L.Ed.2d 877 (2002); McDonald v. Bowersox, 125 F.3d 1183, 1186 (8th Cir.1997) (per cu-riam) (same).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester
La. Ct. App. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Kutzner v. Cockrell, 303 F.3d 333, 337 (5th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, stay denied, 536 U.S. 978 , 123 S.Ct. 14 , 153 L.Ed.2d 877 (2002) (“Importantly, due process is not implicated by the prosecution’s introduction or allowance of false or perjured testimony unless the prosecution actually knows or believes the testimony to be false or perjured; it is not enough that the testimony is challenged by another witness or is inconsistent with prior statements.”) In the instant case, although Ms. Pollard’s testimony at the second trial was not identical to her testimony at the first …
Dix
v.
United States
01-10094.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Aug 5, 2002.
536 U.S. 978
Published

536 U.S. 978

DIX
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 01-10094.

Supreme Court of the United States.

August 5, 2002.

1

Petitions for rehearing denied.