green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.1 score
“the ninth circuit, along with every other circuit to consider the issue, has held that cvap is the appropriate measure to use in determining whether an additional effective majority-minority district can be created.”
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Montes v. City of Yakima
the ninth circuit, along with every other circuit to consider the issue, has held that cvap is the appropriate measure to use in determining whether an additional effective majority-minority district can be created.
cited
Cited "see"
Walshaw v. Commonwealth
See Hartman v. Lee, 283 F.3d 190, 199 (4th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1114 , 123 S.Ct. 851 , 154 L.Ed.2d 789 (2003); Satcher, 244 Va. at 257 , 421 S.E.2d at 843 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hall v. Virginia
See Cano v. Davis, 211 F.Supp.2d 1208, 1231 (C.D.Cal.2002) (observing that "unless the minority group can establish that an effective majority-minority district can be created, a vote dilution claim is not cognizable because there is no minority voting power to dilute."), aff'd, 537 U.S. 1100 , 123 S.Ct. 851 , 154 L.Ed.2d 768 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hall v. Commonwealth of VA
See Cano v. Davis, 211 F.Supp.2d 1208, 1231 (C.D.Cal.2002) (observing that “unless the minority group can establish that an effective majority-minority district can be created, a vote dilution claim is not cognizable because there is no minority voting power to .dilute.”), aff'd, 537 U.S. 1100 , 123 S.Ct. 851 , 154 L.Ed.2d 768 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Radogno v. Illinois State Board of Elections
See also Cano v. Davis, 211 F.Supp.2d 1208, 1218 (C.D.Cal.2002) (three-judge court), aff'd, 537 U.S. 1100 , 123 S.Ct. 851 , 154 L.Ed.2d 768 (2003) (rejecting Shaw challenges to districts in which no single racial group comprised more than 39.8% of the registered electorate, explaining that these demographics did not send the “pernicious” message with which Shaw was concerned).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hartman
v.
Lee, Warden
v.
Lee, Warden
02-6565.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 2003.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Washington (1)
HARTMAN
v.
LEE, WARDEN.
No. 02-6565.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 13, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 283 F.3d 190.