green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed
Cited "see"
Caidor v. Onondaga County
See 8 Bogle-Assegai v. Connecticut, 470 F.3d 498, 504 (2d Cir. 9 2006) (“‘[I]t is a well-established general rule that an 10 appellate court will not consider an issue raised for the 11 first time on appeal.’”) (quoting Greene v. United States, 12 13 F.3d 577, 586 (2d Cir. 1994) (alteration in original)). 13 “However, because the rule is prudential, not 14 jurisdictional, we have discretion to consider waived 15 arguments.” Sniado v. Bank Austria AG, 378 F.3d 210 , 213 16 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted), vacated on other grounds, 17 542 U.S. 917 , 124 S. Ct. 2870 (2004).
Veneman, Secretary of Agriculture, Et Al.
v.
Montana Wilderness Assn., Inc., Et Al.; And Blue Ribbon Coalition, Inc., Et Al. v. Montana Wilderness Assn., Inc., Et Al.
v.
Montana Wilderness Assn., Inc., Et Al.; And Blue Ribbon Coalition, Inc., Et Al. v. Montana Wilderness Assn., Inc., Et Al.
03-109.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 21, 2004.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari granted, judgment vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, ante, p. 55.