discussed Cited "see" Genesee Scrap & Tin Baling Co. v. City of Rochester See Van Der Linde Housing, Inc. v. Rivanna Solid Waste Auth., 507 F.3d 290, 293 (4th Cir.2007) (governmental action taken pursuant to police power “must be sustained against a constitutional challenge ‘so long as it bears a rational relation to some legitimate end’ ”) (quoting Helton v. Hunt, 330 F.3d 242, 246 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 967 , 124 S.Ct. 436 , 157 L.Ed.2d 312 (2003)); Kutrom Corp. v. City of Center Line, 979 F.2d 1171, 1174 (6th Cir.1992) (“The lenient ‘rational basis’ standard finds its least stringent application in eases involving a governmental unit’s…

discussed Cited "see" Jeremiah W. Holder v. Carla R. Holder See Delvoye v. Lee, 329 F.3d 330, 334 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 967 , 124 S.Ct. 436 , 157 L.Ed.2d 312 (2003) (holding that a child born in Belgium was nonetheless habitually resident in the United States because the mother “traveled to Belgium to avoid the cost of the birth of the child and intended to live there only temporarily”); see also Beaumont & McEleavy, supra, at 112 (suggesting that, at times, a child may be without a habitual residence because “if an attachment [to a State] does not exist, it should hardly be invented”).