Jones-El v. Berge, Warden, 543 U.S. 1093 (2005). · Go Syfert
Jones-El v. Berge, Warden, 543 U.S. 1093 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
58 citation events (58 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Kaufman (wva, 2011-06-22) · Strongest negative: Singh v. City of New York (nysd, 2005-11-29)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "but see" Singh v. City of New York
S.D.N.Y. · 2005 · signal: but see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the jury's role as the finder of fact does not entitle it to return a verdict based only on confusion, speculation or prejudice-
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Kaufman
W. Va. · 2011 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
nless qualify as testimonial,' crawford is inapplicable and roberts continues to apply.
discussed Cited "see" People v. Mazzeo
N.Y. App. Div. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
Although "the Attorney-General's prosecutorial authority is strictly limited to the specific statutory grants of such authority" ( Matter of Haggerty v Himelein , 89 NY2d 431, 435 [1997]), a district attorney may enlist the help of an assistant attorney general in prosecuting a case by appointing him or her as an assistant district attorney, provided that such appointment is made in accordance with the dictates of County Law § 702 and that the district attorney retains "ultimate prosecutorial authority" over the matter ( id. at 436; see People v Glanda , 5 AD3d 945, 948 [2004], lvs denied 3 N…
discussed Cited "see" Felder v. Dickhaut
D. Mass. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Horton v. Allen, 370 F.3d 75, 82 (1st Cir.2004) (“In some circumstances, defense counsel’s interest in protecting the accused’s right to a completely public trial may give way to other concerns, such as maximizing the accused’s chance for obtaining a favorable jury composition.”) cer t. denied, 543 U.S. 1093 , 125 S.Ct. 971 , 160 L.Ed.2d 905 (2005).
cited Cited "see" Dilworth v. Goldberg
S.D.N.Y. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hernandez v. Keane, 341 F.3d 137, 144 (2d Cir.2003), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1093 , 125 S.Ct. 971 , 160 L.Edüd 905 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" Nails v. LaPlante
D. Conn. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hernandez v. Keane, 341 F.3d 137, 146-47 (2d Cir.2003) (summary judgment appropriate where deliberate indifference claim relied on delay in providing risky treatment), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1093 , 125 S.Ct. 971 , 160 L.Ed.2d 905 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" Furr v. Brady
1st Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
The “contrary to” criterion is not satisfied unless the state court “arrive[d] at a conclusion opposite to that reached by [the United States Supreme] Court on a question of law or if the state court decide[d] a case differently than [the Supreme] Court has on a set of materially indistinguishable facts.” Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 413 , 120 S.Ct. 1495 , 146 L.Ed.2d 389 (2000); see Horton v. Allen, 370 F.3d 75, 80 (1st Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1093 , 125 S.Ct. 971 , 160 L.Ed.2d 905 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sloane v. Borawski
W.D.N.Y. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
“The subjective element of deliberate indifference ‘entails something more than mere negligence ... [but] something less than acts or omissions for the very purpose of causing harm or with knowledge that harm will result.’ ” Hathaway, 99 F.3d at 553 , citing Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 , 114 S.Ct. 1970 , 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994); see also Hernandez v. Keane, 341 F.3d 137, 144 (2d Cir.2003), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1093 , 125 S.Ct. 971 , 160 L.Ed.2d 905 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cox v. State
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Horton v. Allen, 370 F.3d 75, 84 (1st Cir.2004) (“statements ... made during a private conversation” are nontestimonial), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1093 , 125 S.Ct. 971 , 160 L.Ed.2d 905 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sleeper v. Spencer
D. Mass. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
STANDARD OF REVIEW Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), a state prisoner is entitled to relief where a state court adjudication “resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of clearly established Federal law.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(1); see also Horton v. Allen, 370 F.3d 75, 80 (1st Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1093 , 125 S.Ct. 971 , 160 L.Ed.2d 905 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Locicero v. O'CONNELL
S.D.N.Y. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
On the one hand, “a defendant in a § 1983 action may not be held liable for damages for constitutional violations merely because he held a high position of authority.” Black v. Coughlin, 76 F.3d 72, 74 (2d Cir.1996); see also Hernandez v. Keane, 341 F.3d 137, 144 (2d Cir.2003), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1093 , 125 S.Ct. 971 , 160 L.Ed.2d 905 (2005).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Carpenter
Conn. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Horton v. Allen, 370 F.3d 75, 85 (1st Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1093 , 125 S. Ct. 971 , 160 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Smith
Conn. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Horton v. Allen, 370 F.3d 75, 85 (1st Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1093 , 125 S. Ct. 971 , 160 L.
Jones-El
v.
Berge, Warden
04-7266.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 2005.
543 U.S. 1093

543 U.S. 1093

JONES-EL ET AL.
v.
BERGE, WARDEN, ET AL.

No. 04-7266.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 18, 2005.

1

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.