green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Com. v. Porter, A.
Commonwealth Commonwealth v. • Edwards, 588 Edwards, 588 Pa. 151 , Pa. 151, 168, 903 A.2d, 168 , 903 A. 2d. 1 139, 1148 1139, (2006), certiorari 1148 (2006), certiorari denied, denied, 549 549 U.S. 1344 , 127 U.S. 1344 , S.Ct. 2030, 127 S.Ct. 2030 , 167 L.Ed.2d 167 L.Ed.2d 772 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
Pedro Segura, Jr. v. State
See Davis v. State, 169 S.W.3d 660, 667 (Tex. App.—Austin 2005), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1344 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Martin, D.
See also Commonwealth v. Edwards, 903 A.2d 1139 , 1147- 1148 (Pa. 2006) (affirming defendant’s burglary conviction where defendant gained entry into victim’s home by deception, telling victim he was there to pay for previously stolen drugs), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1344 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
See, e.g., Coleman v. Quarterman, 456 F.3d 537, 542 (5th Cir.2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1343 , 127 S.Ct. 2030 , 167 L.Ed.2d 772 (2007) (quoting Rowell, 398 F.3d at 378) (“[N]o Supreme Court or Circuit precedent constitutionally requires that Texas’s mitigation special issue be assigned a burden of proof.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. McKellick
(2×)
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Edwards, 588 Pa. 151, 182 , 903 A.2d 1139, 1156-57 (2006) (“[T]he Commonwealth need only lay a foundation that would justify an inference by the finder of fact of the likelihood that the weapon was used in the commission of the crime.”), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1344 , 127 S.Ct. 2030 , 167 L.Ed.2d 772 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Felix Rocha v. Rick Thaler, Director
See, e.g., Moore v. Quarterman, 534 F.3d 454, 463 (5th Cir.2008) ("Here, the CCA explicitly dismissed Moore’s successive application (where he first raised Brady) as an abuse of the writ, and 'Texas’s abuse of the writ doctrine is a valid state procedural bar foreclosing federal habeas review.' ”) (quoting Coleman v. Quarterman, 456 F.3d 537, 542 (5th Cir.2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1343 , 127 S.Ct. 2030 , 167 L.Ed.2d 772 (2007)). . 160 S.W.3d 56 (Tex.Crim.App.2005) (per curiam). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trevino v. Thaler
See, e.g., Coleman v. Quarterman, 456 F.3d 537, 542 (5th Cir.2006) (“Texas’s abuse of the writ doctrine is a valid state procedural bar foreclosing federal habeas review.”), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1343 , 127 S.Ct. 2030 , 167 L.Ed.2d 772 (2007); Aguilar v. Dretke, 428 F.3d 526, 533 (5th Cir.2005) (holding the Texas abuse of the writ rule ordinarily is an adequate and independent procedural ground on which to base a procedural default ruling), cert. denied, 547 U.S 1136, 126 S.Ct. 2059 , 164 L.Ed.2d 793 (2006); Matchett v. Dretke, 380 F.3d 844, 848 (5th Cir.2004) (holding the violation of …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ramos v. State
Compare Rubio v. State, 241 S.W.3d 1, 9-11 (Tex.Crim.App.2007) Crawford error), Clay, 240 S.W.3d at 904-05 (Crawford error), Scott v. State, 227 S.W.3d 670, 690-95 (Tex.Crim.App.2007) (Crawford error), Davis v. State, 203 *362 S.W.3d 845, 850-53 (Tex.Crim.App.2006) (Crawford error), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1344 , 127 S.Ct. 2037 , 167 L.Ed.2d 774 (2007), Jones v. State, 119 S.W.3d 766, 777-82 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) (erroneous admission of confession), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 905 , 124 S.Ct. 2836 , 159 L.Ed.2d 270 (2004), and McCarthy v. State, 65 S.W.3d at 52-56 (erroneous admission of confession), …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oliver v. Quarterman
See, e.g., Coleman v. Quarterman, 456 F.3d 537, 542 (5th Cir. 2006), cert denied, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 2030 , 167 L.Ed.2d 772 (2007) (quoting Rowell, 398 F.3d at 378 ) (“[N]o Supreme Court or Circuit precedent constitutionally requires that Texas’s mitigation special issue be assigned a burden of proof.”).
Mark Duane EDWARDS, Jr., petitioner,
v.
PENNSYLVANIA.
v.
PENNSYLVANIA.
06-8504.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 16, 2007.
Cited by 28 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, denied.